Nets Interested In Paul Millsap?

January 18 2013 at 10:27pm CDT By Chuck Myron

Though he'll be a unrestriced free agent this summer and has been the subject of frequent trade rumors this season, Paul Millsap isn't eager to leave the Jazz. The team has reportedly been in no rush to trade him or Al Jefferson, but when the deadline comes around, Sam Amico of Fox Sports Ohio tweets that the power forward could wind up in Brooklyn. Amico hears the Nets may make a play for the seventh-year veteran, though he cautioned that such a move shouldn't be deemed "likely" at this point. 

Brooklyn's incumbent power forward, Kris Humphries, has disappointed after re-signing for two years and $24MM this past offseason, and has fallen out of the starting lineup. Earlier this season, the team was reportedly pursuing Ersan Ilyasova, who was the Nets' first choice over the summer before they re-signed Humphries. When Luke Adams of Hoops Rumors examined Humphries' trade candidacy, he noted reports that suggested the Nets were never all that high on him, so it's reasonable to expect they'd go after another power forward.

If the Nets want an upgrade, they'll probably have to do it via trade, since they're set to have no cap room in the summer. Acquiring Millsap at the deadline could be risky, as he could leave as a free agent, but trading for him would give the Nets his Bird rights, which would allow them to re-sign him despite their lack of space under the cap.

There have been conflicting reports on whether the Jazz are more likely to deal Millsap or Jefferson, both of whom are in the final year of their deals. A month ago, Hoops Rumors readers seemed split on which the Jazz would be better off trading, and a roughly equivalent number said the Jazz should trade them both. 

4 thoughts on “Nets Interested In Paul Millsap?

    1. No way the Jazz do that. Why would they add a bad contract for a good player that will be off the books? Milsap never gets injured, he’s young, underpaid considering what other guys in his position get, and he’s always good for 15/8 a night. You want them to take back two players that have underperformed, one with a bad contract? Those 1st rounders also don’t mean much since this years draft is supposed to be very weak.

      1. Bad contract? He expires next season. Utah is more likely to trade for a star then signing one in free agency. Big expiring contracts are key in trades like that. If they can’t sign players next season it also protects them from having to sign guys long term just to reach the salary floor.

        1. Yeah…but they already have Favors and Kanter waiting in the wings if either big man goes. Why would they take back a bad contract with ANY amount of years left for a spot they already have plenty of young talent at? If Utah is more likely to trade for a star, why would they want Humphries or Brooks? No other team is going to trade a “star” for that package, they’d be better off trading Milsap to that team instead.

Leave a Reply