A player who is eligible for restricted free agency doesn't become a restricted free agent by default. His team must issue him a qualifying offer to avoid having him become unrestricted.
The value of a qualifying offer - which is essentially a one-year contract offer that gives the player's original team the right of first refusal in the event he signs an offer sheet with a rival suitor - is determined by one or more factors, including the player's draft position, his previous salary, and/or his minimum salary. The player's role in the year or two leading up to his restricted free agency also plays an an important part in determining the amount of his qualifying offer.
If a player starts at least 41 games or logs at least 2,000 minutes in the season before he reaches restricted free agency - or averages 41 starts or 2,000 minutes during the two seasons prior to free agency - it increases the value of his qualifying offer, as we explain in more detail in a glossary entry.
While it's generally a good thing for a player if he meets this "starter criteria," doing so often doesn't have a major impact on his free agency, as we've noted in the past. For instance, if a restricted free agent is on track for a four-year, $120MM contract, it doesn't matter all that much if the value of his qualifying offer gets bumped from $6MM to $8MM, since it was always going to be just a placeholder anyway.
However, seeing the way that free agency played out for RFAs like Jonathan Kuminga, Quentin Grimes, and Cam Thomas a year ago provided a good reminder that changing the value of a player's qualifying offer can have a real impact on his contract negotiations.
Kuminga, for example, failed to meet the starter criteria, which reduced the amount of his qualifying offer from about $10.24MM to $7.98MM. If he'd been eligible for that higher QO, maybe Kuminga would've been more inclined to accept it rather than sign a two-year offer from the Warriors that required him to give up his trade veto power and add a second-year team option.
Grimes, meanwhile, did meet the starter criteria in 2024/25, which bumped the value of his qualifying offer from $6.31MM to $8.74MM. After unsuccessful contract negotiations with the Sixers, he ultimately signed that QO, giving him a de facto no-trade clause for '25/26 and lining him up to reach unrestricted free agency this summer. There's no guarantee Grimes would've made that same decision if his qualifying offer had been worth $2.43MM less -- in that scenario, maybe one of Philadelphia's multiyear offers would have looked more appealing.
As for Thomas, he fell short of the starter criteria due to repeated hamstring issues, resulting in a $5.99MM qualifying offer instead of one worth $8.74MM. He still ended up accepting it, but it's worth asking whether the Nets would have even put that higher QO on the table at all if Thomas had met the starter criteria, or if they would've let him become an unrestricted free agent last July. The contract offers Brooklyn made him before he signed the qualifying offer were reportedly very modest, and the team was willing to waive him outright earlier this month after not finding a trade for him at the deadline.
So which of this year's potential restricted free agents could be most impacted by the starter criteria in the same way that some of 2025's top RFAs were?
