Windhorst: Damian Lillard Trade Market Is Quiet

Damian Lillard speculated about possible trade destinations in a Showtime interview last week, but he and the Trail Blazers appear committed to continuing their partnership, ESPN’s Brian Windhorst said Wednesday during an appearance on “Get Up” (video link).

Asked whether Lillard is likely to be on a different team at the start of next season, Windhorst said he doesn’t expect that to happen “as of right now.”

“They publicly haven’t sounded like they want to trade him. I can tell you privately the Blazers aren’t interested in trading him right now either,” Windhorst explained. “I have to underline ‘right now’ because we’re in a fluid situation.”

The fluidity stems from Lillard’s desire to see Portland trade its first-round pick for veteran help rather than bringing in more young talent. Some lottery luck gave the Blazers the No. 3 selection, but Lillard emphasized in an interview after the regular season ended that he doesn’t want to be part of a rebuilding project.

Lillard alluded to that statement while talking to Showtime, saying the organization has “an opportunity, asset-wise, to build a team that can compete.” But he also made it clear that his philosophy on trading the pick hasn’t changed, adding, “If we can’t do that … then it’s a separate conversation we would have to have.”

Although that sounds like a message to management that he’ll want out if the pick isn’t dealt, Windhorst said the rumor mill is currently quiet regarding a potential Lillard trade.

“I am hearing nothing,” Windhorst added. “Nothing from the Dame side. Nothing from the Blazers’ side formally that he doesn’t want to be there.”

If the Blazers keep their pick, they are expected to take either Brandon Miller or Scoot Henderson, whichever player is left on the board after Charlotte’s selection at No. 2. Although they’re high-level prospects who might be able to contribute right away, they’re both 19, which Windhorst points out is the exact situation that Lillard said he doesn’t want to be part of.

View Comments (33)