Hoops Rumors Originals

2025’s Most Valuable Traded Second-Round Picks

Fans of lottery-bound NBA teams will be keeping a close on the bottom of the league’s standings down the stretch because of the effect that “race” will have on the draft order and lottery odds for the 2025 first round.

However, it’s not just the first round of the draft that’s worth keeping an eye on. Those reverse standings will also dictate the order of the draft’s second round, and an early second-round pick can be nearly as valuable as a first-rounder.

[RELATED: Traded Second-Round Picks For 2025 NBA Draft]

Here are a few of the traded 2025 draft picks that will land near the top of the second round:


From: Washington Wizards
To: Boston Celtics
Current projection: No. 31

The Celtics are the defending champions and one of the biggest threats to win the NBA’s 2025 championship. They also have the league’s third-highest payroll. Teams in that position are generally running a draft-pick deficit, having gone all-in to fortify their roster, but that’s not the case in Boston, where the Celtics control their own first-rounder (currently projected to be No. 28) along with this Wizards second-rounder that could be the best day-two selection in this year’s draft.

The Wizards originally traded swap rights to their 2025 second-round pick during the 2021 offseason as part of the five-team blockbuster that netted them Spencer Dinwiddie, Kyle Kuzma, and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, among others.

Those swap rights changed hands a few times and eventually got tied up with a handful of other swaps. The Celtics acquired them in the 2023 offseason from the Pistons as part of a deal that saw them down six spots in the draft from No. 25 to No. 31 (Detroit used the 25th pick on Marcus Sasser).

Boston will technically receive the most favorable of four second-round picks (Washington’s, Golden State’s, Dallas’, and Detroit’s), but there’s no chance that won’t be the Wizards’ selection.


From: Utah Jazz
To: Minnesota Timberwolves
Current projection: No. 32

While the Lakers made a run to the Western Conference Finals later that season, it’s hard to argue that the Timberwolves didn’t ultimately get the best of the three-team 2023 deadline deal with Los Angeles and Utah that saw them land Mike Conley and Nickeil Alexander-Walker, two players who continue to play major roles in Minnesota.

As part of that three-team trade, which allowed the Jazz to acquire the Lakers’ top-four protected 2027 first-round pick, Minnesota received multiple second-round picks from Utah, including this year’s selection.

Like the Celtics, the Timberwolves have one of the NBA’s highest payrolls, so this extra second-round pick should come in handy for an organization looking to keep its tax bill in check next season — drafting a player in the second round and signing him to a rookie-minimum contract (or something close to it) is the most effective way for a team to limit the cap/tax impact of a roster spot.


From: New Orleans Pelicans
To: Charlotte Hornets
Current projection: No. 34

It has been a long, winding road for this second-round pick, which was – sort of – first sent to Memphis in a three-team 2021 trade. That deal, which also included Charlotte, saw New Orleans acquire Jonas Valanciunas, Devonte’ Graham, and the draft rights to Trey Murphy.

The Pelicans actually included the Lakers’ top-10 protected 2022 first-round pick in that trade, but because it landed in its protected range in ’22 (eighth overall), New Orleans instead owed the Grizzlies a pair of second-rounders, one of which was this 2025 selection.

From there, the Grizzlies traded the Pelicans’ 2025 second-rounder to the Suns in 2023 as part of a package for pick swaps; Phoenix flipped it to the Spurs a few days later as part of a Cameron Payne salary dump; and San Antonio brought it full circle by sending it to Charlotte in a salary dump of Graham during the 2024 offseason.

At the time of that last trade between the Spurs and Hornets, Graham was in the final season of the four-year contract he received as part of the sign-and-trade agreement that sent him from Charlotte to New Orleans in the original 2021 deal. The Hornets traded away Graham and didn’t get the 2025 Pelicans pick in that initial transaction, but ultimately ended up with both last summer (they subsequently waived Graham).

Of course, when the Spurs attached this pick to Graham’s contract to get out of his modest $2.85MM partial guarantee, they couldn’t have known things would go so bad in New Orleans that this pick would land in the mid-30s. Their loss will be the Hornets’ gain. Charlotte also controls its own second-rounder and is currently on track to pick at both 33 and 34.


From: Toronto Raptors
To: Detroit Pistons
Current projection: No. 35/36

The Raptors are tied in the standings with Brooklyn and have the league’s easiest remaining schedule, so it’s possible this pick could move from the mid-30s into the late-30s. It’ll still be a valuable asset for the Pistons, who will almost certainly lose their own first-round pick, making this their highest selection in the 2025 draft.

This Raptors pick was one of three second-rounders Detroit acquired from Dallas in last summer’s Tim Hardaway Jr./Quentin Grimes swap. The Mavericks had previously acquired it from the Spurs as part of the three-team sign-and-trade deal for Grant Williams in 2023. San Antonio, in turn, acquired it from Toronto in the Jakob Poeltl trade between the two teams earlier that year.

Given their spot near the bottom of the NBA’s standings, the Raptors would certainly prefer to still have their own second-round pick, but they’ll have a pretty favorable alternative — they control Portland’s second-rounder, which currently projects to be No. 40.

Mavs’ Two-Way Players Approaching Active-Game Limits

Injuries have decimated the Mavericks‘ roster and have compromised their ability to compete in the second half of this season. The team had just nine healthy players active on Sunday and saw that number drop to eight in the second game of a back-to-back on Monday.

While at least a couple of Dallas’ inactive players – Kyrie Irving and Olivier-Maxence Prosper – have sustained season-ending injuries, there’s still hope that some of the others on the injured list will be able to return in the coming weeks. In the meantime, the club will have to get by with what it has.

The Mavs’ limitations are exacerbated by the fact that they imposed a hard cap on themselves at the first tax apron by completing certain roster moves (including using the non-taxpayer mid-level exception and acquiring a player via sign-and-trade) early in the 2024/25 league year, then spent nearly all the way up to that hard cap in player salaries.

Dallas is currently operating with a team salary of $178,080,852, which is a mere $51,148 below the first apron. Because a veteran-minimum free agent addition would count toward the cap at a rate of $11,997 per day, the Mavs can’t sign a 15th man until April 10, when there are just four days left in the season.

There’s another set of limitations the Mavericks will have to be aware of as they set their active roster for games this month. Players on two-way contracts can’t be active for more than 50 regular season games if they signed before the start of the regular season. That limit becomes a prorated portion of 50 games if a player signed at some point after the season began.

Here’s what that means for Dallas’ trio of two-way players:

Edwards’ restriction is the most concerning. The former Pepperdine standout has become Dallas’ de facto starting center due to the team’s litany of frontcourt injuries and has emerged as a crucial contributor. In Monday’s win over San Antonio, he registered his first double-double of the season, with 22 points and 11 rebounds in 35 minutes.

But if the Mavericks keep Edwards active going forward, he’ll reach his 50-game limit on March 21, with 11 games still left in the season. And he can’t be promoted to the 15-man roster at that point due to the Mavs’ aforementioned hard cap — if the team wants to promote him, it would have to wait until April 10 to do so.

The restrictions facing Williams and Jones aren’t quite as critical, especially since both players are currently among Dallas’ walking wounded. Williams missed Monday’s game with left hamstring tightness, while Jones has been out for three games due to a left quad strain.

Of course, while that means Williams and Jones may not eat up their remaining active games in the short term, having them among the many Mavericks on the injury list is a problem in its own right. Jones’ absence is especially unfortunate, given that he was just signed on March 3 so that the team could add some size and take advantage of the 12 games he’d be eligible to play in.

Jones had 21 points and eight rebounds in his Mavs debut, but hasn’t been able to suit up since then. And the club doesn’t have the ability to replace him (or Edwards or Williams) with a new two-way player, since the deadline for signing two-way deals passed on March 4.

When a team is hit particularly hard by injuries, the NBA has the ability to grant hardship exceptions, which allow the team to temporarily exceed its usual 15-man standard roster. But hardship deals still count against the cap and can’t be used to circumvent hard-cap rules, so they’re of little use to the Mavericks, who would have otherwise qualified for more than one of them in recent weeks.

The only way Dallas would have a chance to free up more flexibility below its hard cap would be to reach a buyout agreement with a player that reduces his salary or to cut a player and hope he gets claimed on waivers. The former option probably isn’t realistic; the latter might hurt more than it would help, since it would cost the Mavs a player good enough to warrant a waiver claim.

While it’ll be interesting to see if Dallas can hang onto the 10th spot in the Western Conference and qualify for the play-in, at this point it would be a victory for the team if it can just get through the season’s last few weeks without suffering any more injuries or wearing out any of its remaining healthy players.

Checking In On Traded 2025 First-Round Picks

With just five weeks left in the NBA’s regular season, we have a pretty good general sense of what the final standings will look like in 2024/25. While seeding in both the playoff race and the lottery standings remains up for grabs, there’s more clarity on which 2025 first-round picks traded with protections will actually change hands and which ones will fall within their protected range.

We’re checking in today on those picks, taking a closer look at which traded first-rounders will roll over to 2026, which ones will be conveyed, and which ones are still up in the air.

Let’s jump right in…


Traded 2025 first-round picks that will be protected:

  • Wizards‘ pick traded to Knicks (top-10 protected).
  • Jazz‘s pick traded to Thunder (top-10 protected).
  • Hornets‘ pick traded to Kings (top-14 protected).

We’ll start with three of the most straightforward picks of the bunch. The Wizards (13-49), Jazz (15-48), and Hornets (15-48) currently own the three worst records in the NBA, which means there’s no chance of their traded first-round picks conveying this year.

If either the Wizards or the Jazz went on a hot streak in the season’s final weeks and finished as low as seventh in the lottery standings, there would be an ever-so-slight chance of that team’s pick falling outside of the top 10. But the odds of that happening are so minuscule that it’s not really worth discussing. There’s a very good chance that these three teams will all be picking in the top half of the lottery in June.

After they keep their first-rounders for 2025, the Wizards will instead owe their top-eight protected 2026 pick to the Knicks, the Jazz will owe their top-eight protected 2026 pick to the Thunder, and the Hornets will instead fulfill their obligation to the Kings by sending their 2026 and 2027 second-round picks.

Traded 2025 first-round picks unlikely to change hands:

  • Trail Blazers‘ pick traded to Bulls (top-14 protected).

The Trail Blazers are four games behind No. 10 Dallas in the Western Conference standings, and with the injury-plagued Mavericks at risk of sinking like a stone, we can’t safely rule Portland out of the play-in race quite yet.

But the Blazers are a long shot for that spot, and likely wouldn’t win back-to-back play-in games on the road to make the playoffs even if they did come away with the No. 10 seed. So it seems pretty safe to assume Portland will hang onto its own first-round pick, even if we can’t guaranteed it quite yet.

Assuming the Blazers retain their first-rounder, they’ll instead owe their top-14 protected 2026 pick to the Bulls.

Traded 2025 first-round picks that will change hands:

  • Suns‘ pick traded to Nets or Rockets (unprotected).
  • Hawks‘ pick traded to Spurs (unprotected).
  • Timberwolves‘ pick traded to Jazz (most/least favorable; unprotected).
  • Bucks‘ pick traded to Nets (top-four protected) or Pelicans (5-30 protected).
  • Knicks‘ pick traded to Nets (unprotected).
  • Lakers‘ pick traded to Hawks (unprotected).
  • Nuggets‘ pick traded to Magic (top-five protected).
  • Cavaliers‘ pick traded to Suns (most/least favorable; unprotected).

Seven of these eight picks are unprotected and the eighth – the Nuggets’ first-rounder – has such light protection that there’s no chance it won’t change hands. Still, there are a few conditions worth noting.

The Suns’ first-rounder, for instance, will technically be sent to Brooklyn, but the Rockets will have the ability to swap their own first-round selection for that pick and will almost certainly do so, since they’re currently ahead of Phoenix in the standings by 9.5 games. In that scenario, Houston will end up with Phoenix’s pick (currently projected to be No. 12, per Tankathon) and the Nets would get the Rockets’ pick (No. 23 right now).

The Jazz will receive the more favorable of the Timberwolves’ and Cavaliers’ first-round picks, while the Suns receive the least favorable of the two. That means the Minnesota first-rounder (currently No. 19) will go to Utah and the Cleveland first-rounder (No. 30) will go to Phoenix, since the Cavs are currently 18 games ahead of the Wolves in the standings.

The Bucks’ pick, meanwhile, will go to Brooklyn if it lands between 5-30 or to New Orleans if it ends up in the top four. Milwaukee should comfortably earn a playoff spot in the East, so there’s essentially no scenario where the Pelicans end up with that pick, which projects to be No. 22 as of today. The Bucks will convey that pick to the Nets and their obligation to New Orleans will be extinguished.

The other picks are relatively straightforward. The Hawks’ pick headed to the Spurs figures to end up at No. 15 or 16 if Atlanta makes the playoffs or in the 10-12 range if they don’t. Of course, there’s always a chance it could move into the top four if the Hawks are in the lottery, which is a scenario San Antonio will be rooting for.

The Knicks’ pick going to Brooklyn, the Lakers’ pick going to Atlanta, and the Nuggets’ pick going to Orlando currently project to be 25th, 26th, and 27th overall, respectively.

Traded 2025 first-round picks likely to change hands:

  • Kings‘ pick traded to Hawks (top-12 protected).
  • Pistons‘ pick traded to Timberwolves (top-13 protected).
  • Clippers‘ pick traded to Thunder via swap rights (unprotected).
  • Warriors‘ pick traded to Heat (top-10 protected).
  • Grizzlies‘ pick traded to Wizards (top-14 protected).
  • Thunder‘s pick traded to Clippers via swap rights (unprotected).

The Kings aren’t a lock to make the playoffs, but they increasingly look like a pretty safe bet to at least qualify for the play-in tournament. In that scenario, they’d either clinch a playoff berth or end up at No. 13 or No. 14 in the lottery standings, meaning the only outcome that would prevent the Hawks from receiving their pick would be if the pick jumps into the top four on lottery day — the odds of that happening would be extremely slim.

The Pistons haven’t clinched a playoff berth yet, but they have a five-game lead on the No. 7 Hawks for a top-six seed, so it’s a pretty safe bet their first-round pick will be sent to the Timberwolves, finally freeing Detroit of that obligation — that first-rounder has landed in its protected range three years in a row.

The Thunder technically have the ability to swap their own first-round pick for either the Rockets’ or the Clippers’ first-rounder. Houston has a 4.5-game lead in the standings on L.A., so Oklahoma City is more likely to use that swap on the Clippers’ pick (as of today, that would mean moving up from No. 29 to No. 17), but it’s not set in stone yet.

If the Clippers pass the Rockets in the standings, it would actually be bad news for Brooklyn, since after the Thunder swap with Houston, the Rockets could use their swap rights (outlined in the section above) to send OKC’s pick to Brooklyn for the Suns’ first-rounder.

Finally, there’s still a non-zero possibility that the Warriors and/or Grizzlies drop into play-in territory and miss the playoffs, so we can’t say with certainty yet that the Heat and Wizards will receive those first-rounders. But both picks are likely to convey, and Miami is in especially good shape to get Golden State’s selection even if the Dubs end up in the lottery — the pick would have to jump into the top four in that scenario for the Warriors to keep it.

Traded 2025 first-round picks still very much up in the air:

  • Sixers‘ pick traded to Thunder (top-six protected).
  • Heat‘s pick traded to Thunder (top-14 protected).

These are the two picks whose odds of conveying remain closest to 50/50.

As of today, the Sixers have the NBA’s seventh-worst record, which would mean they’d have a 31.9% chance of hanging onto their pick. But they’re only a half-game ahead of Brooklyn in the standings and one game ahead of Toronto. If the 76ers finish with the sixth-worst record, their odds of keeping their pick would increase to 45.8%. With the fifth-worst record, that number would jump to 63.9%. So this one will come down to lottery night.

If Philadelphia’s pick lands in its protected range, the club would instead owe its top-four protected 2026 first-rounder to Oklahoma City.

As for the Heat, they remain firmly in the mix of an uninspiring play-in race in the East, with a 29-34 record that’s good for the No. 9 seed. If they’re able to earn a playoff spot via the play-in tournament, they’d send their pick to the Thunder. If not, they’ll keep it and would owe their unprotected 2026 first-rounder to OKC.

Disabled Player Exceptions For 2024/25 Expire On Monday

A series of disabled player exceptions granted to teams earlier in the 2024/25 season will expire on Monday if they go unused. The annual deadline to use a disabled player exception is March 10.

We go into more detail on who qualifies for disabled player exceptions and how exactly they work in our glossary entry on the subject. But essentially, if a team has a player suffer a season-ending injury prior to January 15, the exception gives that team the opportunity to add an injury replacement by either signing a player to a one-year contract, trading for a player in the final year of his contract, or placing a waiver claim on a player in the final year of his contract.

Here are the teams whose DPEs will expire if they aren’t used on by the end of the day on Monday, per Eric Pincus of Sports Business Classroom:

The Pacers were granted a second disabled player exception worth $1,118,846 for James Wiseman‘s season-ending injury, but forfeited it when they dealt Wiseman to Toronto at the trade deadline.

Since the trade deadline has passed and no players are currently on waivers, there’s essentially just one way left for those teams with disabled player exceptions to use them: signing a free agent. However, that seems unlikely, given that there are no free agents on the buyout market who would warrant a contract worth more than the veteran’s minimum.

In other words, these exceptions will, in all likelihood, expire on Monday without being used. Assuming that happens, no team will have used a disabled player exception this season.

Disabled player exceptions have never been used with much frequency, but the fact that mid-level and bi-annual exceptions could be used for the first time this season to acquire players via trade or waiver claim has further reduced their importance.

Poll: Who Is The NBA’s 2024/25 MVP?

Nuggets superstar Nikola Jokic concluded Friday’s overtime game against the Suns with the league’s first-ever 30/20/20 game, having totaled 31 points, 21 rebounds and 22 assists.

In some ways, the three-time MVP’s history-making stat line is almost unsurprising. Jokic continues to be on the forefront of award discussions while putting up video-game level stat lines every night.

The 30-year-old big man is averaging career highs of 28.9 points and 10.6 assists per game, while his 12.9 rebounds per game would be the second-best mark of his career. He’s doing this on an incredibly efficient .577/.439/.818 shooting split. His 43.9% three-point percentage and 4.4 attempts from deep per game are also both career highs.

And while Jokic’s stats might be unsurprising after three MVPs and six All-NBA appearances, it does not mean they should go overlooked. This kind of production is what fans read about in history books and resembles something of an old Wilt Chamberlain stat line.

Being an MVP isn’t all about individual statistics, however. Being the league’s most valuable player means leading a winning situation and making one’s teammates better. Jokic fulfills this criteria, having helped the Nuggets overcome a relatively shaky start to the season. Denver won nine straight from late January to late February and has emerged victorious in 14 of its last 17 games.

Christian Braun is having a season worthy of the Most Improved Player award and Russell Westbrook is proving to be a nice fit, along with other contributions up and down the lineup from the Nuggets’ starters and role players. Jokic has good players around him, but there’s no doubt he’s helping set them up for success.

Despite Jokic’s historic achievements, he’s still trailing Thunder superstar Shai Gilgeous-Alexander in NBA.com’s most recent MVP ladder. Entering Friday, Gilgeous-Alexander appeared to be the runaway favorite for the award.

Gilgeous-Alexander, by the way, is absolutely deserving of the praise. He’s averaging a league-leading and career-high 32.8 points along with 5.1 rebounds and 6.2 assists per game. His 1.8 steals per night are second to only Dyson Daniels and he has posted an impressive .526/.378/.898 shooting line.

As we wrote Thursday, Gilgeous-Alexander’s efficiency is off the charts. His true-shooting and usage percentages are career highs, and he ranks first in the league among guards in the former category.

The Canadian superstar finished second in MVP voting last year and may very well come away with the award this year. He has become the NBA’s surest bet to score 50 points on a given night, having done so four times in the last seven weeks after having previously never accomplished the feat in his career.

Like Jokic, Gilgeous-Alexander accomplishes the two-pronged test of winning games and helping his teammates. The Thunder own the league’s second-best record at 52-11, sitting atop the Western Conference. Oklahoma City has only dropped two games since the start of February, winning 15 of its previous 17.

What’s more, the Thunder are doing this in the face of multiple injuries to key players. Marquee free agent addition Isaiah Hartenstein missed over 20 games due to injury this season while star second-year center Chet Holmgren has been limited to just 18 appearances. Lockdown defender Alex Caruso, acquired via trade, has also missed over 20 games.

There’s no doubt multiple Thunder players like Jalen Williams, Cason Wallace and Aaron Wiggins, to name a few, deserve individual praise. But Gilgeous-Alexander’s presence and elite offensive production are certainly helping bring out the best in those players as well.

Beyond the two hottest names in Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander, it’s easy to forget other players are worthy of being thrown into the conversation as well. Giannis Antetokounmpo‘s 30.8 points and 12.1 rebounds per game should not be overlooked. Jayson Tatum, Karl-Anthony Towns and Evan Mobley are also putting up tremendous numbers on contending teams. But all signs point to Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander being the top two in voting.

As NBA.com’s Shaun Powell writes, the Nuggets and Thunder play each other for the final two times this regular season on Sunday afternoon and Monday evening in back-to-back games. The results of those two contests could help sway voters in one direction or another. Premier matchups between the league’s best tend to go the most-noticed among fans, so it will be interesting to see if Jokic continues to close the perceived gap in the race. For what it’s worth, Basketball Reference’s 2024/25 NBA MVP tracker gives Jokic a 65.1% chance to win the award.

Regardless of what happens, it will be interesting to see if the clash between Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander ends up as close as Jokic’s first MVP win over Joel Embiid in ’21/22, the tightest race in recent memory. Both Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander are worthy of the honor and are putting up generational-type seasons.

That leads us to today’s question: Who should win the ’24/25 MVP award? Head to the comments to share your pick between Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander or to let us know if you believe another player should come away with the award.

Community Shootaround: Phoenix Suns’ Outlook

The Suns gave fans in Phoenix something to cheer about on Tuesday night as they rallied from a 23-point second-half deficit against the Clippers to get back in the win column.

But it has been has still been a miserable stretch for the team — since the start of February, the Suns have lost 11 of 15 games and have fallen from eighth place in the Western Conference to 11th, three games out of a play-in spot.

Even Tuesday’s comeback victory wasn’t without some drama, as star forward Kevin Durant had to answer questions after the game about a heated exchange with head coach Mike Budenholzer that occurred during the first quarter.

A slew of injuries in Dallas have opened the door for the Suns to potentially catch the Mavericks for the No. 10 seed and make the play-in tournament. But accomplishing that feat won’t be easy, given that they have the most difficult remaining schedule in the NBA, per Tankathon. And even if they can get to No. 10, nothing the Suns have shown this season suggests they’re capable of winning two play-in games on the road, then upsetting the top-seeded Thunder in the first round of the playoffs.

As Zach Harper of The Athletic writes, the Suns have the NBA’s most expensive roster ($214MM+) and project to have the fourth-highest luxury tax bill in league history ($152MM+). Their defense is one of the league’s worst, ranking ahead of only Utah, New Orleans, and Washington. They have a -2.5 net rating when their “big three” of Durant, Devin Booker, and Bradley Beal share the court together.

It all points to a roster in desperate need of a shake-up, and it certainly seemed as if the Suns were aware of that fact ahead of last month’s trade deadline, though the team’s second-apron position made it difficult to navigate the trade market. The front office spent weeks trying to find a way to acquire Jimmy Butler using Beal as an outgoing piece, but found no takers for the guard’s unwieldy maximum-salary contract.

In the days leading up to the deadline, Phoenix pivoted to exploring the trade market for Durant, which “blindsided” the team’s top scorer. Back in the fall, Suns owner Mat Ishbia expressed confidence about signing Durant to an extension during the 2025 offseason, but a summer divorce now seems to be a far more likely outcome, given how irked the 36-year-old was to be put on the trade block without his knowledge.

Appearing on ESPN Countdown on Sunday (Twitter video link), Shams Charania suggested it will be an eventful offseason in Phoenix.

“Unless there’s a significant run here into the playoffs for the Phoenix Suns, league sources believe that there will be real changes in Phoenix coming to the Suns,” Charania said. “From a roster standpoint, that likely starts with Kevin Durant.

“… From my understanding, what it would look like is the Suns and Durant would work together on any potential trade to a contender. I would expect four to six contending teams with some serious involvement in Durant. He’s still playing at a really high level. He is extension-eligible in the offseason too, and as we know with the Jimmy Butler situation, the extension plays a big factor.”

As Charania points out, we may not get clarity on what the group of suitors for Durant would look like until later in the spring, since early postseason exits or deep playoff runs could make certain clubs more or less inclined to pursue a maximum-salary star entering his age-37 season.

Of course, if major changes are afoot in Phoenix, we shouldn’t necessary assume that Durant will be the only key player the team makes available. Beal figures to be back on the trade block, though his contract and his no-trade clause will continue to make it difficult for the Suns to find a taker.

The belief is that Booker will remain off the table, with Phoenix looking to build around him going forward, but Chris Mannix of SI.com (Twitter link) wonders if the Suns might reconsider that stance in the summer, arguing that the franchise would be better off with a full reset.

We want to know what you think. What should the Suns be looking to get back in a trade for Durant? Will it be possible to move Beal? Should Booker be made available? Having traded away control of all of their own draft picks for the next seven years, does a rebuild make any sense for the Suns or should they be looking to quickly retool and remain in the playoff hunt?

Head to the comment section below to share your two cents!

NBA’s Two-Way Signing Deadline Has Now Passed

The deadline for NBA teams to sign players to two-way contracts was Tuesday, March 4. Since that deadline has now passed, no two-way deals can be signed between now and the end of the 2024/25 league year. Clubs will be permitted to begin signing two-way contracts for the ’25/26 season on July 1.

Under the NBA’s previous Collective Bargaining Agreement, two-way signings weren’t permitted after January 15. Teams took advantage of the extended window to complete two-way deals this season, finalizing 30 of them between the February 6 trade deadline and Tuesday’s deadline. During that same period, teams promoted 16 players from two-way contracts to standard deals and made two waiver claims on two-way players.

There were nine teams – the Nuggets, Pistons, Pacers, Grizzlies, Heat, Suns, Kings, Spurs, and Jazz – that didn’t make any moves involving their two-way players between last month’s trade deadline and the two-way signing deadline. The other 21 clubs were active.

As our tracker shows, all 90 two-way slots around the NBA are now filled. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean the 90 players currently on two-way contracts will all finish the season on those deals.

There are still a handful of two-way players who could receive standard contracts before the regular season ends. The Lakers, for instance, will likely consider promoting Jordan Goodwin and/or Trey Jemison to their standard roster in order to make them playoff-eligible.

A team can promote one or more of its two-way players to its standard roster at any time between now and the end of the season — that team simply wouldn’t be permitted to sign a new player to fill the empty two-way slot created by the promotion.

Here are all the transactions related to two-way players that have been finalized since the trade deadline, sorted by team and listed in the order they were completed (from earliest to most recent):


Atlanta Hawks

Boston Celtics

Brooklyn Nets

Charlotte Hornets

Chicago Bulls

Cleveland Cavaliers

Dallas Mavericks

Golden State Warriors

Houston Rockets

Los Angeles Clippers

Los Angeles Lakers

Milwaukee Bucks

Minnesota Timberwolves

New Orleans Pelicans

New York Knicks

Oklahoma City Thunder

Orlando Magic

Philadelphia 76ers

Portland Trail Blazers

Toronto Raptors

Washington Wizards

Players Waived After Saturday Won’t Be Playoff-Eligible

In order to retain his postseason eligibility for a new NBA team, a player must be waived on or before March 1. That means that any player who remains on an NBA roster after Saturday won’t be eligible to suit up in the playoffs for a new team, though there’s at least one key exception to that general rule.

A player who is currently on a 10-day contract – or a current free agent who signs one after March 1 – will retain his playoff eligibility going forward. For instance, once Lamar Stevens‘s 10-day deal with the Grizzlies expires on Sunday night, he’d still be able to re-sign with Memphis or join a new team and be eligible to play in the postseason, since he’s not being placed on waivers after March 1.

That rule applies even if a player has his 10-day contract terminated early, since that player becomes a free agent immediately without being required to pass through waivers.

Here’s the list of players on 10-day contracts that run through at least March 1 who will retain their playoff eligibility when their current deals expire:

Kevin Knox (Warriors), Kevon Harris (Hawks), and Malachi Flynn (Hornets) are also reportedly set to sign 10-day contracts this weekend. They’re all playoff-eligible too.

Since it’s often a point of confusion, it’s worth clarifying that a player doesn’t have to sign with a new team by March 1 to be playoff-eligible — he simply can’t be placed on waivers after 11:59 pm Eastern time on Saturday.

For example, P.J. Tucker was waived by Toronto on Friday. As long as he signs with a new team by the final day of the regular season (April 13), he can play in the postseason (including play-in games). If he had been cut two days later, on Sunday, Tucker would have lost his postseason eligibility.

The buyout market in 2025 hasn’t been all that active, with Ben Simmons, Javonte Green, Torrey Craig, and Alex Len among the only veterans of note who have been waived and found new NBA teams in February.

All of those players – and those who have been waived but haven’t yet signed with new teams, such as Josh Richardson, Reggie Jackson, and Mohamed Bamba – will be playoff-eligible for their new clubs, but anyone on a standard or two-way contract who is waived after Saturday won’t be. We’ll be keeping a close eye on the NBA’s transaction wire over the next 24 hours to see who else might land on waivers before that deadline passes.

Community Shootaround: Coach Of The Year

More than any other NBA end-of-season award, Coach of the Year depends in large part on the preseason expectations for a given team. The top candidates for Coach of the Year recognition almost always come from the teams that surpass the win totals projected for them in the fall by the greatest margin.

It’s perhaps no surprise, then, that a pair of head coaches from the Central Division are currently considered the frontrunners for this season’s award.

Oddsmakers pegged Cleveland’s over/under for this season at 48.5 wins, but the 48-10 Cavaliers are on the verge of surpassing that total with six-and-a-half weeks left in the regular season. New head coach Kenny Atkinson, hired away from the Warriors last spring, has unlocked the Cavs’ offense, which has posted a league-leading 122.2 offensive rating this season after finishing at 114.7 (16th) in 2023/24.

In an unusual twist, Atkinson’s stiffest competition may come from the man he replaced in Cleveland. J.B. Bickerstaff was let go by the Cavaliers last spring and their results this season suggest it was the right move. But Bickerstaff has been a revelation in Detroit, where the Pistons, projected for an over/under of 24.5 wins, currently hold a 32-26 record.

We knew coming into the season that the Pistons probably weren’t going to go 14-68 again, like they did under Monty Williams a year ago, but there weren’t too many experts or fans who expected them to make a strong push for a guaranteed (top-six) playoff spot in the East. As of today, they holds the No. 6 seed, with a four-game cushion on the No. 7 Magic.

After finishing 27th in offensive rating and 25th in defensive rating last season, the Pistons rank in the top 13 in both categories in ’24/25, with Bickerstaff pressing all the right buttons to unlock first-time All-Star Cade Cunningham and to keep the team on course after its second-leading scorer (Jaden Ivey) went down with an injury on New Year’s Day. The Pistons haven’t just stayed afloat in Ivey’s absence — they’ve thrived, going 17-8 in the 25 games since he broke his fibula.

A pair of Southwest teams have exceeded expectations this season too, with Taylor Jenkins of the Grizzlies and Ime Udoka of the Rockets guiding their teams to 38-20 and 36-22 records, respectively. There was a sense coming into the season that Memphis would bounce back with better health luck and that a young Houston team would take another step forward, but I don’t think many of us were betting on both teams maintaining a 50-win pace beyond the All-Star break.

Of course, while it’s less of a surprise, given that they were the West’s top seed last spring, it’s impossible to overlook the job Mark Daigneault has done with the Thunder, whose 46-11 record puts them hot on Cleveland’s heels as the NBA’s No. 1 overall team. Oklahoma City’s +12.6 net rating is the league’s best mark and would be the second-best net rating of all-time, behind the 1995/96 Bulls (+13.4).

In the East, Joe Mazzulla has done a good job making sure the Celtics don’t succumb to a post-championship hangover, leading the team to a 42-16 record.

A pair of Los Angeles-based head coaches deserve credit too — oddsmakers projected the Lakers and Clippers to be the bottom two teams in the Pacific standings this season, but they hold the division’s top two spots to date. J.J. Redick‘s Lakers are 35-21, while Tyronn Lue‘s Clippers are 31-26 despite missing star forward Kawhi Leonard for a good chunk of the season.

We want to know what you think. Who would your Coach of the Year pick be at this point in the season? Which three coaches would be on your Coach of the Year ballot? Who do you think will ultimately win the award?

Head to the comment section below to weigh in with your thoughts!

Josh Giddey Is Only 2025 RFA To Meet Starter Criteria So Far

When a player on an expiring contract is eligible for restricted free agency, his qualifying offer is determined in part by whether or not he met the “starter criteria” during the season – or two seasons – leading up to his free agency. As we explain in our glossary entry, a player meets the starter criteria when he achieves one of the following:

  • He plays at least 2,000 minutes or starts 41 games in the season before he reaches free agency.
  • He averages either 2,000 minutes or 41 starts in the two seasons prior to his restricted free agency.

If a top-14 pick coming to the end of his rookie contract fails to meet the starter criteria, the value of his qualifying offer declines. Conversely a player who was drafted at No. 10 or later or who went undrafted altogether can increase the value of his qualifying offer by meeting the starter criteria.

In many cases, an increase or decrease to a qualifying offer won’t materially affect the player’s restricted free agency, since a QO is just a one-year contract offer issued in order for the team to retain its right of first refusal. The player has the option of accepting it, but in most cases it functions as a placeholder until the RFA signs an offer sheet with a rival team or negotiates a new multiyear contract with his current team.

Warriors forward Jonathan Kuminga, for example, will likely sign a lucrative long-term deal when he reaches free agency this summer, so it won’t matter all that much if he falls short of the starter criteria and his QO drops from the standard amount of $10,240,287 to $7,976,830.

But for a player who is less likely to secure a significant payday but still a good bet to receive a qualifying offer, a difference of a few million dollars between potential QOs could have a major impact on how his free agency plays out. That difference may affect how willing a team is to put the qualifying offer on the table and how likely the player is to simply accept it.

With all that in mind, it’s worth checking in on which potential 2025 restricted free agents have actually met the starter criteria so far this season and which ones are on track to do so. The first list is a short one: Bulls guard Josh Giddey is the only player to meet the starter criteria so far.

Giddey had a huge head-start because he made 80 starts for Oklahoma City in 2023/24, meaning he just needed to make two starts this season in order to achieve an average of 41 for the past two seasons. He made his second start for the Bulls way back on October 25, which means his qualifying offer this summer will be $11,142,057 instead of dropping to $7,976,830.

None of the 10 other potential restricted free agents have met the starter criteria though. Of those players, the following three were lottery picks, with their default qualifying offers noted in parentheses:

  1. Jonathan Kuminga, Warriors ($10,240,287)
  2. Davion Mitchell, Heat ($8,741,210)
  3. Ziaire Williams, Nets ($8,353,153)

Kuminga has only started 10 games this season and will fall short of the starter criteria, which will bump his QO down to $7,976,830. Mitchell and Williams still have a chance to get there though — Mitchell has 28 starts under his belt, while Williams has 26. They both need to reach 41 to achieve the starter criteria, and they’ve been regular starters for their respective teams as of late. If they hang onto their starting jobs and stay healthy, they’ll surpass 41 starts.

Again, Kuminga’s free agency is unlikely to be affected by his smaller qualifying offer, since his offer will likely just serve as a placeholder and a last-resort fallback option. Maybe the Nets will be slightly less inclined to give Williams a qualifying offer if it’s worth $8.35MM instead of $7.98MM, but that’s such a small gap that it’s unlikely to affect the team’s QO decision either way. The same goes for Mitchell and the Heat.

The other seven players on expiring contracts who are eligible for restricted free agency are Cam Thomas (Nets), Santi Aldama (Grizzlies), Quentin Grimes (Sixers), Tre Mann (Hornets), Isaiah Jackson (Pacers), Day’Ron Sharpe (Nets), and Jabari Walker (Trail Blazers). Jaden Springer, Chris Duarte, and Bones Hyland were also part of this group before being waived this month.

Of those players, only Thomas has a realistic chance of meeting the starter criteria. He started 51 games last season, which means he needs to get to 31 this season. He’s at 17 and the Nets have 25 left to play. If Thomas can return from his hamstring strain relatively soon, which seems likely, he has a good shot at starting 14 games and reaching the necessary threshold. That would increase his QO from $5,993,172 to $8,741,210.

The others will remain eligible for their standard QOs, based on draft position (or their prior salary, in Walker’s case), as follows:

  1. Tre Mann, Hornets ($6,964,982)
  2. Isaiah Jackson, Pacers ($6,422,431)
  3. Quentin Grimes, Sixers ($6,311,825)
  4. Day’Ron Sharpe, Nets ($5,983,683)
  5. Santi Aldama, Grizzlies ($5,940,797)
  6. Jabari Walker, Trail Blazers ($2,524,624)