The Cavaliers won last night’s lottery, their second time doing so in three years. Who will they take with the first pick?
Mike Krzyzewski isn't ruling out returning as the coach of USA Basketball through the 2016 Olympics, Pete Thamel at SI.com reports. "There's a chance," Krzyzewski says, "That's correct." USA Men's Basketball chairman, Jerry Colangelo, said "Give it another week and we should be resolved."
The Men's Basketball national team will be meeting for a mini-camp this summer from July 22-25, but they're still not decided on a coach, unless Krzyzewski comes back to coach again after winning the gold medal at this past summer's Summer Olympics. So, do you want Coach K back, or would you prefer one of these other candidates?
Earlier today the NBA’s Board of Governors voted against moving the Kings to Seattle. But this process is far from over, even if the Kings play their games in Sacramento next season. Do you think the team will ever move to the Seattle?
This year's free agent market is fairly underwhelming, especially if you believe that top unrestricted free agent Chris Paul will re-sign with the Clippers. However, it's a pretty solid crop at the two-guard position. Tyreke Evans is undoubtedly the premier restricted free agent in the group, unless you don't consider him to be an actual two-guard. Meanwhile, Monta Ellis, O.J. Mayo, and J.R. Smith all hold player options and could receive massive paydays if they opt out. Beyond those players, you have names such as Kevin Martin of the Thunder and J.J. Redick of the Bucks available as unrestricted free agents. We want to know how you rank the top UFAs at the two-guard position this summer…
Create your free online surveys with SurveyMonkey , the world's leading questionnaire tool.
Once you've voted, you can check out the results right here.
Eight coaches who’ve guided teams to the NBA Finals within the past 15 years have been linked to open jobs within the past month. One, Mike Brown, was re-hired by the Cavaliers, the team he took to the Finals in 2007. Another is Phil Jackson, who doesn’t appear to be interested in coaching again. His 11 championships would make him the obvious top choice for many, but even without him, there’s an impressive collection of veteran coaches on the market.
There are also plenty of worthy up-and-comers in the mix for coaching jobs. Still, even for those who follow the likes of Kelvin Sampson, Brian Shaw and Michael Malone on a nightly basis, there’s no telling exactly how it will go once a career assistant has an NBA team of his own. Sampson has a little more oomph to his resume, since he took over the Rockets for a while during Kevin McHale‘s absence this season, but even that experience pales in comparison to the lengthy track records of some of the coaches looking for work. Teams with their eyes set on a splashy hire, like the Nets, appear destined to go with someone their fans have seen on the sidelines before.
Assuming the Zen Master is unavailable, if you were running an NBA front office and had decided to hire a veteran coach, which one would you pick? I’ve listed the six guys, aside from Brown and Jackson, who’ve been to the Finals, but feel free to name another candidate in the comments.
Nuggets head coach George Karl was named the NBA's Coach of the Year today, but the announcement was met with a bit of controversy. Did Karl deserve it, or did another deserving candidate?
All but two of the NBA's eight first round series lasted at least six games, but those two ended in a hurry. The Heat dispatched the Bucks in what felt like three games, while the Spurs had a sweep over their own over the Lakers. We're still in the early stages of the Conference Semifinals, but it already seems clear there won't be a series in this round that's as one-sided as those Heat and Spurs sweeps in round one.
The Grizzlies and Pacers each managed a split in Oklahoma City and New York, respectively, putting the pressure on the favored Thunder and Knicks. The Warriors were on the verge of picking up a victory of their own in San Antonio before blowing a 16-point fourth quarter lead, but they still displayed the ability to hang with the Spurs. Meanwhile, the team that everyone had already penciled in for the Finals trails its series 1-0, after the Bulls upset the Heat in the first game of that series.
Based on what we've seen so far, it seems reasonable to think at least one lower seed will pull off an upset and advance to the Conference Finals. Which team do you think it'll be? Feel free to choose more than one option in the poll below, if you think multiple underdogs will make it through the second round.
Earlier tonight we linked to a report from the Philadelphia Inquirer regarding four possible coaching candidates that the Sixers are interested in interviewing for their open head coaching position. Who do you think is the best fit?
A week ago, I asked Hoops Rumors readers which team down 2-0 in its first round series had the best chance at a comeback. Over 51% of you picked the Grizzlies, and that's certainly looking like the right choice at the moment. The Grizz haven't lost a game since then, taking a 3-2 lead on L.A. with a chance to eliminate the Clippers in Memphis tomorrow night.
The Celtics and Rockets each received some votes in that poll, but both teams' odds of a comeback dwindled significantly when they fell behind 3-0 in their respective series. While there have been plenty of comebacks from a 2-0 deficit in NBA history, no team has ever come back from down 3-0 to win a playoff series. Last night though, Boston and Houston each won its second straight contest to force a pair of Game Sixes.
As Chris Tomasson of FOX Sports Florida (Sulia link) notes, only three teams in NBA history have even forced a Game Seven after being down 3-0, but there are some reasons to believe the Celtics and Rockets have a chance to become the fourth and fifth teams to do so. Boston isn't a typical No. 7 seed, given the significant amount of postseason experience on the roster, and the C's were provided with some extra motivation yesterday when the Knicks dressed all in black in preparation for Boston's "funeral."
Meanwhile, Houston has been much more competitive against the Thunder since Russell Westbrook went down with a knee injury earlier in the series, winning two of the three games Westbrook has missed. Additionally, both the C's and Rockets will be heading back to their home court for Game Six.
It's still a long road to the second round for both Boston and Houston, but not many of us predicted either team would even force a Game Six, so I'm not about to write them off quite yet. What do you think? Will either team make history, becoming the first club to erase a 3-0 deficit to advance in the postseason?
There hasn't been a whole lot of drama so far in the 2013 NBA playoffs, as most series favorites have taken care of business on their home courts. Two games into the postseason, only a pair of series are tied at one game apiece, with the Warriors and Bulls picking up road wins in Denver and Brooklyn, respectively.
Still, as we saw a year ago in the Western Conference Finals when the Thunder reeled off four straight wins against the Spurs after falling into a 2-0 hole, a two-game lead certainly doesn't ensure a series victory. A couple of this year's first round series may end quickly, but I expect at least one or two of these seemingly lopsided matchups to turn into a lengthy series.
What do you think? Which team down 2-0 has the best chance to turn its series around and advance to the second round?