Warriors, Sixers Swap Thompson, Wallace

Courtesy of USA Today Sports Images

Courtesy of USA Today Sports Images

4:36pm: Philadelphia receives the right to swap the lesser of the 2016 first-round picks coming their way from the Heat and the Thunder for Golden State’s 2016 first-round pick, tweets Keith Pompey of the Philadelphia Inquirer.

4:05pm: The Warriors have acquired Jason Thompson from the Sixers in exchange for Gerald Wallace, both teams announced via press release. Cash and draft considerations are also going to Philadelphia in the move. It’s a money-saving deal for Golden State, which sends Wallace’s $10,105,855 salary into Philadelphia’s cap space, with Thompson’s $6,908,685 salary going back in return, and with the Warriors poised to pay the luxury tax this season, the move saves the Warriors from tax penalties of as much as two and a half times the difference between their salaries. It also creates a trade exception worth $3,197,170 for Golden State.

“We’re very happy to add Jason to our roster,” Warriors GM Bob Myers said. “He has a proven track record in this league and adds considerably to our team’s depth, which was a big key to our success last season and will be moving forward.”

Thompson will ostensibly fill the reserve power forward role that David Lee played last year for the champs, who sent Lee to the Celtics in the deal that brought in Wallace. The 29-year-old Thompson has chiefly been a starter during his seven years in the NBA, all of which came with Sacramento before the trade earlier this month that sent him to Philly, but he probably won’t mind a reduced role on a team with a legitimate shot to win another title. Thompson has never appeared in a playoff game.

It was somewhat surprising when reports emerged following Golden State’s agreement on the Lee trade that the Warriors intended to keep Wallace rather than release him and use the stretch provision to spread his salary and lower their tax bill. Thus, it makes sense to see them make another deal that sends Wallace away and takes a chunk out of their team salary. The Warriors were scheduled to pay Lee $15,493,680 this coming season, so they’ve reduced their obligation by more than 50% with the pair of trades. The estimated tax bill for the Warriors drops from $24MM to $16MM with today’s trade, according to former Nets executive Bobby Marks (Twitter link). It had been $38.1MM before the Lee trade, Marks adds. Lee signed his deal prior to the adoption of the current collective bargaining agreement, so he’s ineligible for the stretch provision.

Thompson’s contract runs through 2016/17 with $2.6MM partially guaranteed on a salary of $7,010,378 that season, Marks points out (Twitter link). That salary becomes fully guaranteed if he doesn’t hit waivers by June 26th, 2016, as Marks also notes.

The Sixers receive yet more draft assets and draw closer to the $63MM salary floor. They held more than $20MM in cap flexibility prior to the trade, and they still have about $17.5MM they can spend, not counting their non-guaranteed deals, giving them flexibility to absorb other contracts via trade. They could also float a bloated offer sheet to Norris Cole, in whom they reportedly have interest, or to Tristan Thompson. Philadelphia clears salary from its 2016/17 books, since Wallace is on an expiring contract.

Who do you think got the better end of this trade? Leave a comment to weigh in.

newest oldest

4 thoughts on “Warriors, Sixers Swap Thompson, Wallace

  1. smittybanton

    Save Sacramento $20M and get Stauskas, a future first and swap rights with a historically mediocre franchise. Now save Golden State $11M and give them a young big man, for the low probability that you can move up two or three spots if Miami or OKC unexpectedly have a better record than the Warriors? I don’t get it.

    • bigjabroni

      gerald wallace’s contract expires after the 15-16 season, thompson’s expires after 16-17 season

      • smittybanton

        Cutting him now would cost around $9.6, Wallace’s K is $10.1. No benefit to the Sixers in cash, and the swap is highly unlikely. GSW saves around $8M in taxes and gets a role player.

        • PokeyReesee

          There is likely both a benefit in cash as well as salary cap flexibility. First, you’re forgetting the “cash considerations” in the deal which I think is fair to assume will be the full allowable amount, around 3 million. That offsets the salary difference between the two players. So with the cash even the benefit is getting roughly 3 million dollars off of the sixers cap sheet next year which is the partial guarantee of JT’s contract. Hinkie simply traded present cap flexibility for future cap flexibility and likely saved the organization 3 million dollars (they are going to have to reach the salary floor no matter what so the difference between JT’s salary and Wallace’s is irrelevant. That money has to be given out to the players one way or another, and Hinkie got paid 3 million to do something the league would have forced him to do regardless. Not a mind blowing trade by Hinkie’s standards but it serves a real purpose

Leave a Reply