And-Ones: CBA, Revenue Sharing, Thompson

There’s reason to believe that neither the owners or the players will opt out of the current Collective Bargaining Agreement after the 2016/17 season, David Aldridge of writes in a piece that’s worth a read. Aldridge cites the new television deal, the rising salaries of players, and the success of the current revenue sharing system among the reasons to be optimistic. There’s also hope among the parties involved.

“Can’t imagine either [side] opting out”, one extremely high-ranking team official texted Aldridge last week. “Never know what the player’s union will do but the dollars are getting so big.”

Many players are beyond angry about the billions in salaries they have conceded and they want to recoup some of those losses, but there are some on the players’ side who think the current CBA is providing enough incentive to prevent a lockout.

“Way too much economic prosperity right now for the Owners and the Players with continual Global growth,” a prominent player agent texted Aldridge. “There is NO basis whatsoever for a work stoppage.”

Here’s more from Aldridge’s latest piece:

  • Sources told the scribe that even though the Lakers are consistently major contributors to the plan, the franchise is in support of the current revenue sharing system. The team understands the need for some level of revenue sharing and it isn’t seeking substantial changes to the current system “because it’s working.”
  • Aldridge switched gears to talk about the NBA on the court. He doesn’t believe Tristan Thompson will come to terms with Cleveland on a long-term deal, citing the $14MM schism between the two sides.
  • Aldridge is surprised that Jamal Crawford remains a Clipper and predicts that the guard will be dealt by the trade deadline. Earlier this month, coach/executive Doc Rivers said that it’s unlikely the team will trade the 35-year-old.
newest oldest

2 thoughts on “And-Ones: CBA, Revenue Sharing, Thompson

  1. smittybanton

    Star players have been inordinately involved with the union last couple of years. Eliminating “max salaries” is a reason to blow up the CBA. Doesn’t necessarily mean a strike/lockout. They’re already talking. Owners definitely want second round picks on longer contracts, an expanded draft even. They’ll tweak it at the expense of the scrubs. No reason for Jodie Meeks to be getting $6M.

    • Chuck Myron

      I don’t think the players would need new CBA terms to negotiate that sort of environment. The mid-level is already getting less and less valuable with each year: link to


Leave a Reply

dziennika egzotyczny pieścić medycyny centrum medyczne zdrowie Denver