Hoops Rumors Originals

The Beat: Anthony Slater On The Thunder

anthonyslater

Anthony Slater

Nobody knows NBA teams better than beat writers, save for those who draw paychecks with an NBA owner’s signature on them. The reporters who are with the teams they cover every day gain an intimate knowledge of the players, coaches and executives they write about and develop sources who help them break news and stay on top of rumors.

We at Hoops Rumors will be chatting with beat writers from around the league and sharing their responses to give you a better perspective on how and why teams make some of their most significant moves. Last time, we spoke with John Reid of The Times Picayune about the Pelicans. Click here to see all of the previous editions of this series.

Today, we gain insight on the Thunder from Anthony Slater of The Oklahoman. You can follow Anthony on Twitter at @anthonyVslater, and check out his stories right here.

Hoops Rumors: Kevin Durant seems like such a low-key guy. How do you think he’s going to handle all the questions he’ll face about his future this season as next summer’s free agency approaches?

Anthony Slater: Proactively. He’s already laid some of the ground work. At summer camp with Team USA, Durant told reporters that if sourced stories didn’t come from him, his best friend and manager Charlie Bell or his agent Rich Kleiman, then they aren’t true. Then he announced a partnership with The Players Tribune, giving him a potential outlet to handle circulating rumors and his eventual decision. That, of course, won’t stop the free agency stories from surrounding his entire season. There’s no way to avoid it. Every major market the Thunder visit, media packs will be awaiting Durant with these questions. I expect him to answer all inquiries with a “I’m focused on this season, I’ll worry about free agency when it gets here” type of approach.

Hoops Rumors: What gave the Thunder the confidence to entrust this most critical of seasons to Billy Donovan, a rookie NBA head coach?
Anthony Slater: Sam Presti loves Donovan. Raves about him. In past offseasons, he’s even hired a few guys off of Donovan’s previous staffs. I think this is a move the Thunder GM would have preferred to make a couple years ago, but Scott Brooks had a longer contract and the excuse of injuries. This May, with that health excuse still there, Presti finally decided to pull the trigger. He views Donovan as long-term fit with this organization and, I think, felt giving Durant a taste of that would help keep him here, not hurt it. Plus, to help his transition, Presti hired Monty Williams and Mo Cheeks to his staff. That’s two former NBA head coaches who both have great relationships with Durant and Russell Westbrook.
Hoops Rumors: Does a legitimate chance exist that the Thunder will sign Dion Waiters to an extension before the deadline this fall, or are both sides content to see if he can bounce back this season before making any long-term commitments?
Anthony Slater: No. I’m not sure the Thunder has even presented Waiters with the idea. Before committing to him long-term, I think OKC wants to see how he fits into a stacked lineup with better playmakers around him. How will he handle limited shots? Less minutes on some nights? Can he play better defense? Can he improve his efficiency? Waiters, due for an offseason payday, needs to show Presti and other GMs he’s willing to accept a secondary role. Because he’ll never be a star in this league. If he doesn’t, I’d guess the Thunder will use that freed up money next summer to bring over Spanish sharpshooter Alex Abrines, a 2013 draft-and-stash shooting guard prospect that they love.
Hoops Rumors: With Enes Kanter, Steven Adams and Serge Ibaka all on the interior, plus the occasions that Durant will play as a small-ball power forward and whatever playing time Nick Collison and Mitch McGary get, do the Thunder have enough minutes at the four and the five to keep everyone happy?
Anthony Slater: Besides the health of Durant, that’s one of the key questions this season. It’s a loaded frontcourt rotation and, in theory, a good problem to have. Each of the options has varying and useful skill sets. But you do have to wonder how a few of them will handle the time share. Will Kanter, a newly minted $17MM per year man, accept a bench role? Will an increasingly confident McGary be frustrated if he’s still a fringe rotation guy? If McGary does get those added minutes in his second year, will a 12-year vet like Collison happily slide to the back of the line? They are all saying the right things. But it’s preseason. Not mid-February.
Hoops Rumors: The anticipation over Durant’s 2016 free agency has largely obscured the specter of Russell Westbrook’s ability to become a free agent in 2017. Do you think Westbrook is more likely or less likely than Durant is to sign elsewhere when he gets the opportunity?
Anthony Slater: One may be linked to the other. If KD signs back for the long term, inking a five-year deal, you’d have to assume he’s been assured by Westbrook — one of his best friends — that the superstar partnership will remain in OKC for the foreseeable future. But if Durant leaves, then Westbrook may look around, realize his shot at a title with the Thunder has disappeared and follow his friend out the door. Or it’s possible that Durant does a LeBron James-type one-plus-one contract this summer, giving himself an opt out after the 2017 season and the duo enters free agency together and reassesses from there. That’s what I’d expect to happen.
Hoops Rumors: The top of the Western Conference seemed to grow even stronger this summer, with the Spurs signing LaMarcus Aldridge and David West, the Rockets trading for Ty Lawson and the Clippers adding Paul Pierce and Lance Stephenson. Should the Thunder have made a bold move to distinguish themselves from the pack, or are they better served to ride it out as just one of a handful of contenders?
Anthony Slater: The Thunder’s bold move came this past February. When they realized the Reggie Jackson situation had become toxic, they moved him in a mega-deal to land Enes Kanter, Kyle Singler and D.J. Augustin. That gave them Kanter’s and Singler’s restricted free agency rights. Already over the cap, they would’ve only had around $5MM to go out and spend in free agency, which wouldn’t have landed much in this inflated market. So they retained Singler and Kanter, even though they were forced to overpay, instead of going after the bargain bin of leftovers.

Hoops Rumors Community Shootaround 10/1/15

Cavaliers swingman Iman Shumpert will miss the next 12-14 weeks because of a wrist injury, the team announced on Tuesday. Shumpert, who re-signed with the Cavaliers for four years and $40MM this summer, recently suffered a ruptured extensor carpi ulnaris sheath in his right wrist, according to the team’s statement. The 25-year-old reportedly hit his wrist on the rim during a workout last week but continued to play through it, GM David Griffin said. The injury will force Shumpert out for training camp and the first two months of the regular season.

The Cavs don’t have immediate plans to address the injury with a roster move, Griffin said, according to a report by Dave McMenamin of ESPN.com, but he didn’t rule out doing so at some point. “I think we look at this as a very similar situation to what we went through in the playoffs last year: Next man up,” Griffin said. “We have a roster we feel is deep enough to withstand one injury like this, and so we’re going to give people a chance to kind of absorb it from within, but obviously we’ve been paying attention to a lot of opportunities that we may be able to [use] to improve the group. We’ll just play it by ear.”

This brings me to the question/topic for today: Do the Cavaliers need to make a roster move to replace Iman Shumpert?

Will the Cavs be able to weather the storm with J.R. Smith as the starter and Joe Harris and Mo Williams as the backups? Or should the team make a move to fortify the position either via trade or free agency? If you think the team needs to add another wing, who should they target? Take to the comments below to share your thoughts and opinions. We look forward to what you have to say.

Poll: 2015/16 Team Power Rankings (No. 20)

NBA training camps have officially begun, and teams are now finalizing their preseason rosters. Every new season brings with it the hope for each franchise that it will conclude with the hoisting of the Larry O’Brien Championship Trophy. But for the more jaded fans — or practical, depending on your outlook — not every team has a realistic shot at making the playoffs, much less at being the last team standing when all is said and done and the playoffs have concluded.

We at Hoops Rumors want to know what you, the reader, think about each team’s chances this coming campaign. To help facilitate that, we’ll be posting a series of polls asking you to vote on where in the standings each franchise is likely to end the season. So please cast your vote below for the franchise you expect to end the season with the tenth worst overall record, or at No. 20 overall. But don’t end your involvement with the simple click of a button. Take to the comments section below to share your thoughts and opinions on why you voted the way that you did. We look forward to what you have to say.

Previous Selections:

  • No. 30: 76ers
  • No. 29: Knicks
  • No. 28: Nuggets
  • No. 27: Lakers
  • No. 26: Nets
  • No. 25: Timberwolves
  • No. 24: Trail Blazers
  • No. 23: Magic
  • No. 22: Pistons
  • No. 21: Kings
The No. 20 Ranked Team For the 2015/16 Season Is...
Hornets 25.56% (80 votes)
Jazz 23.96% (75 votes)
Celtics 10.54% (33 votes)
Mavericks 10.22% (32 votes)
Suns 9.58% (30 votes)
Pacers 7.99% (25 votes)
Bucks 2.88% (9 votes)
Cavaliers 1.92% (6 votes)
Clippers 1.28% (4 votes)
Pelicans 1.28% (4 votes)
Wizards 1.28% (4 votes)
Warriors 0.96% (3 votes)
Spurs 0.64% (2 votes)
Raptors 0.64% (2 votes)
Hawks 0.32% (1 votes)
Bulls 0.32% (1 votes)
Grizzlies 0.32% (1 votes)
Thunder 0.32% (1 votes)
Rockets 0.00% (0 votes)
Heat 0.00% (0 votes)
Total Votes: 313

If you’re a Trade Rumors app user, click here.

More Than 120 Players To Hit Waivers This Month

NBA teams can carry as many as 20 players during the preseason, but they have to trim that number to 15 by October 26th, the last day before regular season games begin. Every team is carrying at least 17 players, and almost half the league has full 20-man rosters. Currently, 573 players are under contract with NBA teams. That number will decline to no more than 450 by the deadline later this month, meaning at least 123 players will go on waivers between now and then.

Some teams have more moves to make than others. The Clippers, Pacers and Trail Blazers need only trim two players. Most teams will end up cutting four or five, but some may release even more. Teams need only carry 13 players in the regular season, and while 27 of the 30 teams had full 15-man rosters on opening night last year, the Bulls, who have 19 players in the wake of today’s signing, and other franchises have made a habit of beginning the regular season with smaller rosters.

Most of the extra players on NBA rosters have non-guaranteed or partially guaranteed contracts, so teams have flexibility, but 16 teams can make signings without having to make a corresponding move. Here’s a breakdown of each team’s open preseason roster spots:

Three open preseason spots

  • Clippers
  • Pacers
  • Trail Blazers

Two open preseason spots

  • Hornets
  • Kings
  • Pelicans
  • Suns
  • Timberwolves

One open preseason spot

  • Bulls
  • Lakers
  • Knicks
  • Magic
  • Nuggets
  • Raptors
  • Rockets
  • Thunder

Zero open preseason spots

  • 76ers
  • Bucks
  • Cavaliers
  • Celtics
  • Grizzlies
  • Heat
  • Hawks
  • Jazz
  • Mavericks
  • Nets
  • Pistons
  • Spurs
  • Warriors
  • Wizards

Note: The Cavaliers have 20 players even without Tristan Thompson, so they’ll have to waive somebody for him to come aboard if he does.

Hoops Rumors Community Shootaround 9/30/15

The injury bug has once again stung Bulls point guard Derrick Rose, who sustained a left orbital fracture after taking an inadvertent elbow to the face during practice. Rose underwent surgery today, and he is expected to miss approximately two weeks of action. While the team and Rose dodged a bullet with the point guard not expected to miss any regular season contests, this is just the latest bit of misfortune for the point guard, who has only appeared in a total of 100 games over the last four NBA seasons courtesy of various maladies.

Rose probably didn’t help his cause with the Chicago media and fans of the team when he indicated during the team’s media day sessions that he was looking forward to hitting free agency. The point guard, who is signed through the 2016/17 campaign, did note that he expects to remain in Chicago for the long term, but Rose added that the allure of an increased salary cap and plenty of teams willing to spend would certainly give him reason to test the market.

This brings me to the question/topic of the day: Would the Bulls be better served if Derrick Rose departs after the 2016/17 season as a free agent? 

The 26-year-old was well on his way to becoming one of the best players in the NBA before injuries began to take their toll on his body and production. A healthy Rose would no doubt be worth the maximum salary, whatever that may be by the time 2016/17 rolls around, but pegging his current (or future) value is certainly a difficult task, and it’s one that will make or break some GM’s career when the time comes. The Bulls are hamstrung by Rose’s current salary of $20,093,064, as well as the perpetual worry about if and when he will next succumb to injury. While his current injury can be chalked up to bad luck, Rose’s knees will always be a source of concern, and as he ages his durability isn’t likely to improve.

If you were the GM of the Bulls, would you want to re-sign Rose? If so, what would be the largest contract you would feel comfortable handing over to him? Or would you decide to cut your losses and allow Rose to depart via free agency? Take to the comments section below to share your thoughts and opinions. We look forward to what you have to say.

Poll: 2015/16 Team Power Rankings (No. 21)

NBA training camps have officially begun, and teams are now finalizing their preseason rosters. Every new season brings with it the hope for each franchise that it will conclude with the hoisting of the Larry O’Brien Championship Trophy. But for the more jaded fans — or practical, depending on your outlook — not every team has a realistic shot at making the playoffs, much less at being the last team standing when all is said and done and the playoffs have concluded.

We at Hoops Rumors want to know what you, the reader, think about each team’s chances this coming campaign. To help facilitate that, we’ll be posting a series of polls asking you to vote on where in the standings each franchise is likely to end the season. So please cast your vote below for the franchise you expect to end the season with the ninth worst overall record, or at No. 21 overall. But don’t end your involvement with the simple click of a button. Take to the comments section below to share your thoughts and opinions on why you voted the way that you did. We look forward to what you have to say.

Previous Selections:

  • No. 30: 76ers
  • No. 29: Knicks
  • No. 28: Nuggets
  • No. 27: Lakers
  • No. 26: Nets
  • No. 25: Timberwolves
  • No. 24: Trail Blazers
  • No. 23: Magic
  • No. 22: Pistons
The No. 21 Ranked Team For the 2015/16 Season Is...
Kings 29.22% (90 votes)
Jazz 18.18% (56 votes)
Hornets 17.86% (55 votes)
Mavericks 7.79% (24 votes)
Suns 6.82% (21 votes)
Celtics 6.17% (19 votes)
Pacers 5.84% (18 votes)
Warriors 2.27% (7 votes)
Cavaliers 1.62% (5 votes)
Bucks 1.30% (4 votes)
Rockets 0.97% (3 votes)
Raptors 0.97% (3 votes)
Bulls 0.32% (1 votes)
Grizzlies 0.32% (1 votes)
Thunder 0.32% (1 votes)
Hawks 0.00% (0 votes)
Clippers 0.00% (0 votes)
Heat 0.00% (0 votes)
Pelicans 0.00% (0 votes)
Spurs 0.00% (0 votes)
Wizards 0.00% (0 votes)
Total Votes: 308

If you’re a Trade Rumors app user, click here.

Submit Your Questions For Hoops Rumors Mailbag

Have a question regarding player movement, free agent rumors, the salary cap, the NBA draft, or the top storylines of the week? You can e-mail them here: hoopsrumorsmailbag@gmail.com. Feel free to send emails throughout the week, but please be mindful that we may receive a sizable number of questions and might not get to all of them.

If you missed out on any past mailbags and would like to catch up, you can view the full archives here.

Hoops Rumors Chat Transcript

4:03pm: We hosted the weekly live chat.

3:00pm: Training camps are underway, and but offseason matters linger, with Tristan Thompson facing a key deadline Thursday and the Nuggets poised to land Mike Miller. The trade demand that Markieff Morris made this summer is apparently no longer in effect, but, as with the saga of DeMarcus Cousins, George Karl and the Kings, questions remain over how long the detente will last.

We can talk about all that and more in today’s chat, so click here to join!

Commenting Policy

We strongly encourage commenting at Hoops Rumors, but we do have basic rules of civility. Comments of this nature are not allowed at Hoops Rumors:

  • Attacks or insults toward other commenters, the post author, journalists, teams, players, or agents.
  • Inappropriate language, including swearing and related censor bypass attempts, lewdness, insults, and crude terms for body parts, bodily functions, and physical acts. In essence, we don’t want any language that parents would not want their kids to see.
  • Juvenile comments or extensive use of text message-type spelling.
  • Writing comments in all or mostly caps.
  • Spam-type links or self-promotion.
  • Comments about how you’re sick of this topic or it’s not newsworthy.
  • Inappropriate avatars or images.
  • Anything else we deem bad for business.

If you see comments that fit the above criteria, please flag them and/or contact us.  Bans may be handed out liberally by our moderators, without second chances. Remaining civil is not that difficult, and most commenters have no problems doing so, nor with helping rein each other in. We are grateful for long-time commenters and readers, though this policy applies equally regardless of tenure.

All comments on Hoops Rumors or the Hoops Rumors Facebook page may be repurposed as a part of the Hoops Rumors Featured Feedback series. In these instances, comments may be edited and abridged.

This policy is always available at the bottom of the site, and will be re-posted monthly.

Hoops Rumors Community Shootaround 9/29/15

During the Kings’ annual media day, center DeMarcus Cousins and head coach George Karl referred to their relationship as “solid.” Karl had reportedly wanted to trade Cousins after he took over as the head coach late last season, and Cousins had tweeted emojis depicting a snake in the grass in response. Cousins said their offseason meeting in Las Vegas this summer went a long way toward establishing a relationship between the two men.

“When we met in Vegas, we came to a head and we talked our differences out like men,”€ Cousins had said. “And at the end of the day, it’s about winning games. That’€™s one thing me and him can agree on –€“ we want to win and that’™s our goal and that’s all that really matters, winning.”€ For his part, Karl gave Cousins an A-plus for his offseason training and said Cousins has shown maturity. “€œI see a different player,”€ Karl said. “€œI see a different substance of character in this guy right now.”

This brings me to the question/topic of the day: Will DeMarcus Cousins and George Karl be able to successfully co-exist in Sacramento for the long haul?

The Kings as an organization have not been the picture of stability recently, which led to this unusual situation of a new coach and star player not being, at least initially, on the same page. The organization reportedly considered firing Karl this summer, but cooler heads have seemingly prevailed since then, and all parties involved are now saying the right things publicly. But can this detente last, especially of the team gets off to a rough start in the standings? How long can these two strong-willed men maintain a good working relationship? A week, a month, multiple seasons? Take to the comments section below to share your thoughts and opinions. We look forward to what you have to say.