Hoops Rumors Originals

Poll: Should The Hornets Trade Stephenson?

The Hornets came into the season with ambitions of making a playoff run and challenging for one of the top seeds in the East, but a 4-14 start has team executives worried. The team has reportedly been aggressive in its attempts to find potential trades with other teams. Charlotte made a few big splashes last offseason, as recently noted by Hoops Rumors’ own Chuck Myron. From a financial standpoint, the biggest move was the acquisition of Lance Stephenson via free agency. His arrival hasn’t panned out the way the team had hoped and although it’s unclear whether the Hornets have dangled him in trade discussions, it’s obvious they are looking for upgrade on the wing, Stephenson’s primary position.

It has also been reported that Charlotte is receptive to moving fellow wing Gerald Henderson, so an addition to Stephenson on the court is just as likely, if not more likely, than a replacement. However, as Grantland’s Zach Lowe points out, Henderson’s $6MM player option for next season severely damages his trade value, which should dampen the hopes of getting an impact player in a trade.

The Hornets still have two quality young prospects in Noah Vonleh and Cody Zeller as well as their own 2015 first round pick. Those are three valuable assets, but finding a team willing to give up on a quality player this early in the season could be problematic. Few teams have the urgency to make that sort of move at this juncture.

Stephenson, who cannot be traded until December 15th, represents the player with the most value this season to a playoff contender. Do you think Charlotte should trade him?

Should The Hornets Trade Lance Stephenson?
Yes 59.53% (603 votes)
No 40.47% (410 votes)
Total Votes: 1,013

Players Claimed Off Waivers

The Cavs claimed A.J. Price off waivers this past weekend, but the overwhelming majority of the players who hit NBA waivers go unclaimed during the two-day period that teams have to submit claims. What makes those players expendable for one team usually keeps others from grabbing them, be it inadequate performance, an unwieldy salary, or some combination of the two. Players whom teams waive chiefly for financial reasons are often picked up by other clubs who sign them to cheaper deals shortly after they hit free agency, as their new teams benefit from more team-friendly financial terms than a waiver claim would entail. Any player whom a team claims off waivers continues on his contract as though his old team had never waived him, so there’s often a financial disincentive for teams to submit claims.

Still, nine players have been claimed off waivers since the end of last season, counting Carlos Boozer, whom the Lakers received through amnesty waivers. Most were on minimum-salary contracts with little or no guaranteed money, as we detail in a look at each of those nine:

  • Carlos Boozer (amnesty waivers): Bulls to Lakers — Teams can submit bids for only part of a player’s salary through amnesty waivers, unlike conventional waivers, and the Lakers took advantage. They wound up with Boozer at a fraction of his $16.8MM salary and will pay him just $3.251MM this season, the last that his contract covers. He’s receiving the rest from the Bulls as he racks up 13.1 points and 6.5 rebounds in 26.8 minutes per game for a depleted Lakers team.
  • Earl Clark: Grizzlies to Rockets — The Rockets appear to have made the move solely to obtain Clark’s D-League rights, since Houston waived him just a few days after claiming his non-guaranteed deal. He’s putting up 28.8 PPG and 7.3 RPG for the Rockets D-League affiliate, but he’s reportedly poised to join the Lakers.
  • Jarell Eddie: Hawks to Celtics — It’s tough to see just why the C’s claimed Eddie in the final week of the preseason only to waive him shortly thereafter. Unlike the Rockets and Clark, Boston didn’t keep Eddie’s D-League rights, and he’s playing for the Spurs affiliate instead. Regardless, Eddie’s deal was non-guaranteed, so the only cost to the Celtics was the $1K waiver fee.
  • Willie Green: Clippers to Magic — The Clippers planned to re-sign Green after they waived him rather than guaranteeing his minimum salary, but the Magic, with plenty of cap space, didn’t mind picking up the tab for him, foiling L.A.’s plan.
  • Jordan Hamilton: Raptors to Jazz — The Jazz absorbed a $25K partial guarantee to take on a player who’d performed well in camp for the Raptors, who didn’t have room to keep him into the regular season. Utah soon found it didn’t have much use for Hamilton, either, waiving him about a week later. He’s currently playing with the Grizzlies D-League affiliate.
  • Joe Ingles: Clippers to Jazz — Utah has carved out a much greater role for its other waiver claim, though Ingles is only averaging 2.8 PPG in 18.2 MPG on his non-guaranteed minimum-salary contract. Still, the Clippers were stymied again, as they planned to re-sign Ingles after waiving him, just as with Green.
  • Chris JohnsonCeltics to Sixers — Philadelphia afforded itself a low-risk opportunity to look at the swingman from Dayton, who’s not to be confused with the former LSU center by the same name who was in camp with the Heat. Johnson’s stint with the Sixers lasted only a month and a half, as Philly waived his non-guaranteed minimum-salary deal about two weeks into the regular season.
  • Kendall Marshall: Lakers to Bucks — This was a case of one waiver claim leading to another. The Lakers had to let go of Marshall’s non-guaranteed minimum salary to clear the cap space necessary to finalize a few of their agreements after committing $3.251MM to claim Boozer. Milwaukee made the unusual move of guaranteeing Marshall’s salary for the season, even though he’s seeing only 13.0 MPG this year after averaging 8.8 assists per game in 29.0 MPG for the Lakers last season.
  • A.J. Price: Pacers to Cavaliers — Price was impressive enough during his stint with the Pacers last month to convince the Cavs to reverse their decision from the first week of the season to sign Will Cherry and waive Price. Cleveland released Cherry to bring back Price this time around.

Offseason In Review: Golden State Warriors

Hoops Rumors is in the process of looking back at each team’s offseason, from the end of the playoffs in June right up until opening night. Trades, free agent signings, draft picks, contract extensions, option decisions, camp invitees, and more will be covered, as we examine the moves each franchise made over the last several months.

Signings

Extensions

Trades

  • None

Waiver Claims

  • None

Draft Picks

  • None

Camp Invitees

  • Aaron Craft
  • Jason Kapono
  • Sean Kilpatrick
  • James Michael McAdoo
  • Mitchell Watt

Departing Players

Rookie Contract Option Decisions

For a team without draft picks, cap space, or any members of its starting five entering free agency, the Warriors sure made some critical and potentially franchise-altering decisions this past offseason. A controversial coaching change, a steadfast commitment to Klay Thompson in failed trade talks with the Timberwolves about Kevin Love, and a near-maximum extension for Thompson only seemed to dial up the pressure to challenge for the title.

NBA: Golden State Warriors at Detroit PistonsThe Warriors entered the playoffs in 2013 not having been to the postseason in six years and as an underdog in the first round against the 57-win Nuggets. They won that series and put a scare into the Spurs before succumbing in the next round, and since then, co-owner Joe Lacob’s expectations for the team have ratcheted up. Golden State won four more games in the regular season last year than it did the year before, but it didn’t improve its playoff seeding, and though the Warriors took the Clippers to seven games this past spring before falling in the first round without an injured Andrew Bogut, it didn’t save Mark Jackson‘s job. Jackson had presided over a rapid turnaround in his three seasons as Warriors coach, and he had forged a profound trust with his players, but he failed to get along with some of his assistant coaches and other key figures within the Warriors organization. He also reportedly made a play for other NBA head coaching jobs while still with Golden State. His ultimate shortcoming was in failing to convince Lacob that the team’s on-court performance and locker-room morale were strong enough to justify his continued employment, and the Warriors axed him.

That touched off a wide-ranging search for a replacement that at one point seemed to zero in on Stan Van Gundy, but by the time Golden State met with him, the Pistons had already spoken to him about the dual executive/coaching role he ultimately took on in Detroit. The Warriors were instead seeking a coach who would be just that and leave front office decision-making others. Somewhat curiously, they hired former Suns GM Steve Kerr, whose only experience is as an executive and not as a coach, though Kerr made it clear that he wanted to transition into coaching long before he hooked up with the Warriors, and he reiterated that after his hiring this year. Kerr agonized over choosing the Warriors instead of the Knicks, with whom he could have served under mentor Phil Jackson, but Kerr’s West Coast ties, and doubtlessly the vast gulf in talent between the Warriors and Knicks, proved too strong.

Kerr made it a point to win over Jackson supporters like Stephen Curry and others on the Warriors roster, and the team is off to a roaring start this season. Golden State’s 14-2 record also helps validate the team’s decision to keep Klay Thompson for this season and for the foreseeable future. There’s no guarantee that the Warriors would have wound up trading Thompson to the Wolves if they had been more willing to include him in proposals, particularly given how pleased Minnesota was with the package it received from the Cavs. The deal never would have been Love-for-Thompson straight up, since the salaries wouldn’t have matched, and a variety of other factors involving David Lee, Kevin Martin and Harrison Barnes complicated the discussions, as Tim Kawakami of the Bay Area News Group chronicled.

The inertia didn’t itself guarantee a long-term future together for Thompson and the Warriors, since the fast-rising former No. 11 overall pick was extension-eligible and agent Bill Duffy was going after the max. Lacob vowed this past spring to strike a deal with Thompson, though it wasn’t clear whether he was talking about an extension or a new pact in restricted free agency during the summer of 2015. The owner apparently resisted giving Thompson $15MM salaries, amounts that the max will almost certainly entail. Thompson held firm, and other teams reportedly sniffed around as the extension deadline drew near to see if the Warriors were willing to change course and trade the 24-year-old, but the sides ultimately struck agreement on a pact with an unusual structure.

Thompson will get the max for a player of his experience in the first year of his extension next season, as long as that max doesn’t exceed the $15.5MM that it’s projected to hit, as Grantland’s Zach Lowe reported. It’s a compromise of sorts for both sides, though there’s a strong chance it won’t have wound up costing Thompson a penny if the max doesn’t come in higher than thought. The Warriors appear to have made the more significant concession, especially since the Thompson extension gives them nearly $78.8MM in commitments for next season, including Brandon Rush‘s minimum-salary player option. Former second-round pick Draymond Green wasn’t eligible for an extension even though he was entering the final season of his rookie contract, so he’ll hit restricted free agency in the summer. He’s poised to merit a sizable raise that would make it difficult for the Warriors to avoid the luxury tax should they keep him.

The Warriors figure to have little capacity to spend on upgrades next summer, but they took advantage of the full mid-level exception this year, inking Shaun Livingston months after he finished his strongest campaign since his catastrophic knee injury in 2007. He’s not the player he was before he got hurt, when the Clippers made him the fourth overall pick in 2004, but he was a vital part of a revival for the Nets after they started slowly last season, as his unusual combination of 6’7″ height and ball-handling proved troublesome for opponents. The Warriors struggled all of 2013/14 to fill the role that combo guard Jarrett Jack played in 2012/13 before he departed in free agency, so they outmaneuvered the Nets as well as the Heat, HornetsSpurs, Wolves and Kings in hopes that Livingston would fill that gap. A toe injury slowed him at the start, and he has barely played half as many minutes per game as Jack did in his season by the Bay, but there’s plenty of time left this year, and the Warriors have no need to press him for more, as well as they’ve played as a team.

In any case, the answer at point guard won’t be Nemanja Nedovic, even though Golden State is just a year and change removed from investing the last pick of the first round in him. The Warriors declined his third-year rookie scale option before the season and waived him shortly thereafter, eating only about half of his guaranteed salary for this season thanks to a buyout arrangement. The parting of ways was a somewhat troubling sign for the team, since it gave up $600K in cash and a second-round pick in an odd sequence of trades to acquire Nedovic on draft night in 2013, but, Jimmy Butler aside, late first-rounders often fail to become contributors, much less stars. The Warriors gave a vote of confidence to 2012 30th overall pick Festus Ezeli when they picked up his fourth-year option in October after an injury wiped out his sophomore season, so there’s still a chance that he’ll help the Warriors.

Regardless, this past offseason wasn’t about moves on the margins for Golden State. The Warriors made potentially franchise-altering decisions even though their core remains intact, and the onus is on that core to produce like never before. Lacob has every financial reason to affect significant change and avoid the tax next season, so the Warriors must show they’re close enough to winning a title to ensure that the team as constituted will continue to have chances to do so.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images. The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Offseason In Review: Oklahoma City Thunder

Hoops Rumors is in the process of looking back at each team’s offseason, from the end of the playoffs in June right up until opening night. Trades, free agent signings, draft picks, contract extensions, option decisions, camp invitees, and more will be covered, as we examine the moves each franchise made over the last several months.

Signings

Extensions

  • None

Trades

  • Acquired 2014 pick No. 55 from the Hornets in exchange for cash.
  • Acquired the rights to Sofoklis Schortsanitis from the Hawks in exchange for Thabo Sefolosha (sign-and-trade), the rights to Giorgos Printezis, and cash.
  • Acquired Philadelphia’s 2015 second-round pick (top-55 protected) from the Sixers in exchange for Hasheem Thabeet and $100K cash.

Waiver Claims

  • None

Draft Picks

Camp Invitees

  • Michael Jenkins
  • Richard Solomon
  • Talib Zanna

Departing Players

Rookie Contract Option Decisions

The Thunder may have been disappointed with the conclusion of their 2013/14 campaign, but they were impressive when taking everything in total.  OKC was without star guard Russell Westbrook for nearly half of the season and when the Thunder arrived in the playoffs, they staved off battle-ready teams in the Grizzlies and Clippers before succumbing to the Spurs in six games.  They nearly won 60 games and they were a stone’s throw from the Finals, but after years of being on the cusp, this team isn’t satisfied with moral victories.

Oklahoma City didn’t undergo an offseason overhaul, but that’s not to say that it didn’t make a real run at shaking things up.  The Thunder were one of several teams that went hard after veteran sharpshooter Mike Miller before he landed with LeBron James and the Cavaliers.  They were also hoping to land Pau Gasol, which would have been a monstrous boost to their frontcourt.  Just as the Spurs did, OKC went after the Spaniard with the hope that the allure of winning would help distract from an under-market contract offer.  Ultimately, however, Gasol found a chance to win with better compensation with the Bulls.  Kevin Durant gave it his best shot, but he couldn’t reel in Gasol.  “Obviously [it wasn’t] that close, [but] I did my work. That was my first time recruiting,” Durant said in July.

The Thunder had a few holes to fill over the summer. Backup point guard Derek Fisher left to coach the Knicks, Caron Butler moved on in free agency, and Thabo Sefolosha regressed sharply in 2013/14, ensuring his exit.  The Thunder couldn’t pull off a flashy signing like Gasol or Miller, so they had to dig a little deeper to reload their roster.

Oklahoma City badly needed outside shooting and its signing of the fearless Anthony Morrow made perfect sense.  On a three-year, ~$10MM contract, it’s hard to find fault with the deal given his long-distance acumen and the interest that he had from contenders around the league.  Heading into this season, Morrow had only 129 starts on his resume, but he has shown that he can make an impact with his ability to keep opposing defenses honest.  Unfortunately for the Thunder, he missed the first seven games of the regular season while healing from a sprained left MCL.

With Fisher out of the picture, the Thunder brought Brooklyn’s own Sebastian Telfair aboard to help soak up some of the backup minutes at the one guard.  At the time, the one-year, minimum salary deal seemed like an inexpensive solution to their problem, but things didn’t quite work out.  Just recently, the Thunder bid farewell to Telfair and instead opted to keep fellow point guard Ish Smith.

D-League notable Grant Jerrett was brought back on a four-year, minimum-salary deal with the final two seasons non-guaranteed.  For the time being, it seems like he’s going to remain a D-League staple, but that’s just fine for the Thunder, who aren’t banking on Jerrett to be a key cog this year.  Lance Thomas beat the odds to make OKC’s roster and the Thunder believe that they have found a gem in the former New Jersey high school star.  The Thunder carved out space for guys like Thomas by dumping Sefolosha and Hasheem Thabeet for table scraps, including the rights to Sofoklis “Baby Shaq” Schortsanitis.

The Thunder made moves to try and win a title in the here and now, but they also put a good amount of focus into the draft, where they made two surprising first round selections.  First, with the No. 21 overall pick, the Thunder drafted Michigan big man Mitch McGary. McGary decided to go pro early rather than face a one-year suspension and while there was fear that he wasn’t NBA-ready, the Thunder apparently had no such concerns.  McGary is still waiting to make his NBA debut after a strong performance in the summer league, but the Thunder must be optimistic about the impact he can make this season.

With the No. 29 pick, the Thunder made an even more surprising selection with Stanford forward Josh Huestis.  When Huestis spoke with Hoops Rumors prior to the draft, he projected as a mid-second round pick.  Huestis isn’t a tremendous athlete or a top-notch scorer, but he is a textbook hustle player and a super tough defender.  Huestis’ camp reached agreement on an unusual deal with the Thunder prior to the draft which ticketed him to play for Oklahoma City’s D-League affiliate in his first pro season.

The Thunder didn’t do a whole lot in free agency, but then again, this has never been a team to really build with the open market.  Their quiet offseason may have raised some eyebrows, but the Thunder stand as one of the most fearsome teams in the West, when they’re healthy.  OKC has all of the answers in house. They just need them on the court.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images. The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Hoops Rumors Originals

Here’s a look at the original analysis generated by the Hoops Rumors staff this week..

Offseason In Review: New Orleans Pelicans

Hoops Rumors is in the process of looking back at each team’s offseason, from the end of the playoffs in June right up until opening night. Trades, free agent signings, draft picks, contract extensions, option decisions, camp invitees, and more will be covered, as we examine the moves each franchise made over the last several months.

Signings

Extensions

  • None

Trades

Waiver Claims

  • None

Draft Picks

Camp Invitees

Departing Players

Rookie Contract Option Decisions

The Pelicans are a franchise on the rise thanks to the continued development of their centerpiece player, Anthony Davis. Davis showed remarkable improvement in every facet of his game last season, though his strides weren’t able to prevent New Orleans from notching its third straight losing campaign. The sky is the limit for the 21-year-old big man out of Kentucky, and he is posting MVP-like numbers thus far this season. Davis draws mention in debates about the best player in the league, and in a few short seasons he may be the first player who comes up in those conversations. But the Pelicans’ overall growth as a team the next couple of seasons will be limited by a number of questionable contracts that occupy their balance sheet.

NBA: New Orleans Pelicans at San Antonio SpursOne of the Pelicans’ biggest weaknesses as a team is their outside shooting, and the wing is where two of their more questionable contracts happen to reside in the deals the team gave to Eric Gordon and Tyreke Evans. Neither player has come close to justifying his salary cap number, and it will be extremely difficult for New Orleans to take the next step forward until one or both can be removed from its balance sheet. Gordon’s making nearly $14.899MM this season with a player option for more than $15.514MM next year, while the deal for Evans runs through 2016/17 with salaries that range upward from this season’s more than $9.904MM.

The Phoenix front office is thanking its lucky stars that the Pelicans matched the offer sheet the Suns had inked Gordon to back in 2012. At the time it seemed like a wise move, since the then-23-year-old guard certainly appeared to be a star on the rise. But injuries and unhappiness with his surroundings have rendered him a shell of the player who averaged 22.3 points per game back in 2010/11. It is highly likely that New Orleans will be stuck with Gordon for one more season since he’ll almost certainly exercise his player option.

Barring a trade, Evans will also be occupying a healthy chunk of the team’s cap space for two more seasons beyond this one. The four-year, $44MM offer sheet that New Orleans had inked Evans to before working out a sign-and-trade deal with the Kings was ill-advised, seeing as how Evans’ scoring averages had dropped every season since his Rookie Of The Year campaign back in 2009/10. Evans hasn’t lived up to his contract, but there’s an easy argument to be made that he has provided exactly the production that should have been expected given his track record.

The Pelicans reportedly made Gordon and Evans available in trade talk this past summer, though there were some conflicting reports about whether that was the case with Evans. New Orleans won’t be able to surround Davis with the players needed to maximize his talent and to help the franchise break through in the challenging Western Conference while Gordon and Evans occupy roughly $26MM of cap space. Evans can still be a useful piece despite being overpaid, but Gordon’s deal is an albatross. Either of these two wings will be tough to deal thanks to their contracts, and the Pelicans would likely have to package draft picks and assets alongside either player in order to make a trade palatable to the other team, which presents long-term roster building issues of its own.

New Orleans’ most noteworthy offseason move was the deal that netted them Omer Asik from Houston, one that forced the Pelicans to overcome several obstacles to complete. It was a risky deal on the Pelicans’ part because they sent away a protected first-rounder for 2015, and Asik can become an unrestricted free agent next summer. I like the addition of Asik for basketball reasons since he’ll add rebounding and defense to a team that needed both, but with the Pelicans more than likely to convey that pick to the Rockets next spring, it puts added pressure on New Orleans’ front office to re-sign Asik. He’ll likely command an average annual salary in the $12MM to $14MM range, given his status as an elite defensive force, though that’s just my estimate. It would take up a hefty chunk of cap space, and coupled with player-friendly deals for Evans, Gordon, Ryan Anderson and Jrue Holiday, and with Davis eligible to sign an extension next summer, the Pelicans would soon find themselves severely limited in flexibility moving forward. Plus, Asik proved disruptive regarding his playing time last year with the Rockets, and the Pelicans will have to keep that in mind when they think about re-signing him to a long-term deal.

Pelicans GM Dell Demps didn’t have the cap flexibility this offseason to pursue any big-name free agents, but he did manage to add a number of useful pieces on team-friendly deals. I like that New Orleans took low-risk gambles on Jimmer Fredette, Darius Miller, and John Salmons. None of those players are true game-changers, but all can be valuable bench contributors and offer strong work ethics, and in the case of Fredette and Miller, upside. I also like the team picking up the undrafted Patric Young, who was in the running at times to become an early second-round pick. He’s a long-term project who could end up paying dividends in a season or two.

The Pelicans were without a first-round pick in this year’s draft thanks to the trade with Philadelphia that netted them Holiday. In the second round, Demps did well to snag Louisville point guard Russ Smith, who has the ability to become a valuable reserve for this team, and whose intangibles make him worth having around. Smith should be able to develop enough to replace former No. 10 overall pick Austin Rivers, who can depart as a free agent next summer, since the team declined his fourth-year option. Rivers never lived up to his high draft position, and he could benefit from a change of scenery.

New Orleans needs to be active and creative in the trade market this year to try and clear some much-needed cap room they can use to surround Davis with more productive talent. The Pelicans are a team on the rise, though the strength of the Western Conference will probably force them to miss the playoffs once more this spring. The Pelicans need to give Davis a reason to want to re-sign for the long-term, as well as maximize the contention window that his incredible skills will provide them. If Demps is unable to remove one or more of the questionable deals on the team’s books, it will be a few seasons before he’ll be able to alter the roster significantly. The franchise and its fans had better hope that Davis will not have soured on the team’s losing ways before then and decide to take his skills elsewhere.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images. The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post. Chuck Myron contributed to this post.

Hoops Rumors Glossary: Hardship

[See the updated version of this post here]

The availability of a 16th regular season roster spot to NBA teams was little-used and little-known when the season began a month ago today. The league granted the Timberwolves an extra roster spot in the 2012/13 season, and it did the same for the Pelicans near the end of 2013/14, but the league doesn’t “hand those things out like candy,” as Wolves executive Flip Saunders recently observed. However, poorly timed injuries and illnesses have already prompted three teams to receive clearance to sign extra men this season, and the Wolves and Lakers have explored the possibility of becoming the fourth. All of it has cast the NBA’s hardship roster rules into the spotlight and resolved some of the mystery surrounding them.

The term “hardship” used to be a common part of the league’s vernacular in reference to players who entered the draft before exhausting their college eligibility, but it has a completely different meaning in regard to the size of NBA rosters. The NBA’s Constitution and By-Laws, in their definition of hardship, give the Board of Governors the power to approve special provisions counter to the NBA’s roster limits with a majority vote. Yet the rule also spells out circumstances in which injury and illness would allow teams to receive extra roster spots without Board of Governors approval. In these cases, a team must have four players who have missed at least three straight games because of injury or illness. Should the Commissioner’s Office determine, using an independent doctor if it so chooses, that all four of those players will continue to be unable to play, the team may acquire an extra player. The commissioner can grant additional extra roster spots to the team should he deem that conditions warrant it. The Thunder, one of the teams that carried a 16th player this month, was reportedly ready at one point to seek Adam Silver’s approval for a 17th spot.

The league’s by-laws expound on such roster dynamics much more broadly than the collective bargaining agreement, and the first-time public release of the by-laws, which happened this past spring amid the Donald Sterling scandal, provided new insight into the hardship rule. Yet the by-laws leave some significant questions unanswered, and the way the league has handled the situations involving the Thunder, the Pacers, and a somewhat related scenario in which the Grizzlies received a 16th roster spot, has helped show just how the NBA applies these rules.

The NBA granted the Thunder and Pacers 10-day windows in which they could keep a 16th player on the roster, as several reports have made clear (Update: The 10-day windows can’t cover more than one season, as Eric Pincus of Basketball Insiders and the Los Angeles Times noted). The Pacers essentially acknowledged as much when the league granted them a second window that allowed them to keep A.J. Price, their 16th man. The more hidebound Thunder made no such announcement when they retained Ish Smith for a second 10-day period, but Darnell Mayberry of The Oklahoman, among others, made reference to a pair of 10-day stints for Smith. The Thunder also demonstrated another facet of the hardship rules when they waived Sebastian Telfair instead of Smith to reduce their roster to 15 players. Telfair had been on the roster since the start of the regular season, but even though it was Smith whom the hardship allowed the team to sign, the Thunder were at liberty to choose the player they wanted to unload to get back down to 15 men, as this week’s move indicated.

There appears to be a time limit on the front end of the hardship, too. (Update: That limit is two days, as Mike Bresnahan of the Los Angeles Times indicated via Twitter). The Pacers scuttled their deal with Gal Mekel when a visa complication would have kept him from signing until a day after the Pacers were ready to put pen to paper. That extra day would have pushed the Pacers past the time the league allowed them to add a 16th player, according to Marc Stein of ESPN.com (Twitter link), so they turned to Price instead.

The Wolves considered applying for an extra roster spot this month but were wary of doing so because it would have meant that Nikola Pekovic and Ronny Turiaf would have had to remain out during the 10-day window, as Jerry Zgoda of the Star Tribune reported last week. That suggests that even if injured players make a recovery on a more rapid timetable than the league had thought they would, they’d still be ineligible to play until the 10-day hardship expired.

That didn’t come into play for the Grizzlies, who earlier this month signed Kalin Lucas and Hassan Whiteside to take their roster from 14 to 16 men on a night when five Grizzlies were sick with a stomach virus. Memphis waived Lucas and Whiteside the next day, and a day after that, some of the Grizzlies returned from the virus to play. The 16th roster spot for Memphis was a curious provision on the surface, since the Grizzlies hadn’t had four players miss at least three straight games. But what triggered the extra roster spot for Memphis wasn’t the same as what allowed Indiana and Oklahoma City to add 16th men.

The Grizzlies could take on both Lucas and Whiteside because Nick Calathes was serving a league suspension that had caused him to miss more than five games. In such cases, teams are allowed, without need for Board of Governors approval, to transfer their suspended players to the Suspended List rather than the Active or Inactive Lists. Teams may do the same when a player has served at least three games of a team suspension. When teams put such players on the Suspended List, they’re allowed to add an extra man, and the Grizzlies took advantage.

Note: This is a Hoops Rumors Glossary entry. Our glossary posts will explain specific rules relating to trades, free agency, or other aspects of the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement (or in this case, the NBA’s Constitution and By-Laws). Larry Coon’s Salary Cap FAQ was used in the creation of this post.

2015/16 Projected Cap Flexibility By Team

Trade activity around the league is sure to increase after December 15th, which is the date that the majority of offseason signees become eligible to be dealt. Thanks to the salary cap, there is more for GMs to consider than just the on-court impact any potential transaction will have. There are financial implications that must be weighed, and not just for this season. Many players will be dealt strictly because of their contracts, as teams seek expiring deals, tax relief, future bargains, and other financial gains.

With teams around the league relying more and more on constructing their rosters through free agency, future cap flexibility has never been more important. It’s this eye on flexibility and available salary cap space that will no doubt dictate more than a few transactions prior to this season’s February 19th trade deadline.

Next season’s salary cap is projected to come in at $66.5MM, but the final amount won’t be known until next summer. Still, using that projection as a guideline, I’ve run down the potential salary cap flexibility for each team for the 2015/16 campaign. I included both the fully guaranteed contracts as well as those players with non-guaranteed deals who are signed for next season. While these non-guaranteed deals can easily be removed from each team’s cap figure, a roster move to waive these players would still be required. Teams also have to carry at least 12 players who count against the cap in some form or fashion, either by contract or cap hold, during the offseason, or the league will apply a roster charge for each vacancy. Those roster charges are equivalent to the rookie minimum salary, which for 2015/16 will be $525,093. Other factors that could serve to alter these numbers include player options, early termination options and team options, and they’re included them in the calculations below.

Cap holds for free agents and first-round picks eat up potential cap space, too, but teams can renounce their rights to free agents at any time and, with cooperation from others, either trade their draft picks or stash them overseas. Given the fungibility of those assets, they’re not included in these calculations, unlike non-guaranteed contracts, many of which include partial guarantees and salary that becomes guaranteed at different points throughout the offseason.

As trades begin to occur these numbers below should help explain some decisions and serve as a reference point for the offseason ahead:

76ers 

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$13,508,212 (Five Players)
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$2,792,335 (Three Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$50,199,453

Bucks

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$51,099,680 (11 Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$947,276 (One Player)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$14,453,044

*Includes Jared Dudley‘s early termination option of $4,250,000.

Bulls

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$59,735,202 (Eight Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$1,860,480 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$4,904,318

*Includes Kirk Hinrich‘s player option for $2,854,940 and the $333,333 owed to Richard Hamilton via the stretch provision.

Cavaliers 

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$72,660,099 (Seven Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$11,367,559 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=Over the projected cap by $17,527,658

*Includes LeBron James‘ player option for $21,573,398; Kevin Love‘s player option for $16,744,218; and Mike Miller‘s player option for $2,854,940.

Celtics

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$45,548,917 (Ten Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$3,972,335 (Three Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$16,78,748

*Includes Jeff Green‘s player option for $9.2MM and Jameer Nelson‘s $2,854,940 player option.

Clippers

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$58,537,731 (Seven Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$9,217,500 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=Over the projected cap by $1,255,231

*Includes Jordan Farmar‘s player option for $2,170,465; the $650K owed to Carlos Delfino via the stretch provision; and the $300K owed to Miroslav Raduljica via the stretch provision.

Grizzlies

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$40,190,597 (Eight Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$3,205,465 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$23,103,938

*Includes the $437,080 owed to Fab Melo via the stretch provision and the $163,296 owed to Jamaal Franklin via the stretch provision.

Hawks

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$41,215,385 (Nine Players)
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$947,276 (One Player)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$24,337,339

Heat

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$69,632,912 (Nine Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$2,201,205 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=Over the projected cap by $5,334,117

*Includes Dwyane Wade‘s player option for $16.125MM; Luol Deng‘s player option for $10,151,612; and Danny Granger‘s player option for $2,170,465.

Hornets 

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$64,710,704 (10 Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$0
Projected Cap Flexibility=$1,789,296

*Includes Al Jefferson‘s player option for $13.5MM and Gerald Henderson‘s player option for $6MM.

Jazz

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$49,583,335 (Eight Players)
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$6,620,059 (Three Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$10,296,606

Kings

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$55,330,145 (Eight Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$1,792,335 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$9,377,520

*Includes the $923,780 owed to Wayne Ellington via the stretch provision.

Knicks

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$38,827,141 (Five Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$1,734,572 (One Player)
Projected Cap Flexibility=25,938,287

*Includes J.R. Smith‘s player option for $6,399,750

Lakers

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$36,176,261 (Five Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$10,826,407 (Three Players) **
Projected Cap Flexibility=$19,497,332

*Includes Ed Davis‘ player option for $1,100,602
**
Includes Jordan Hill‘s $9MM team option

Magic

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$38,975,806 (Eight Players)
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$9,042,335 (Four Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$18,481,859

Mavericks

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$42,466,471(Seven Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$1,792,335 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$22,241,194

*Includes the $947,276 owed to Gal Mekel, who was waived; Monta Ellis‘ player option for $8.72MM; Raymond Felton‘s $3,950,313 player option;  and Al-Farouq Aminu‘s player option for $1,100,602.

Nets

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$76,756,235 (Eight Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$3,652,815 (Four Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=Over the projected cap by $13,909,050

*Includes Brook Lopez‘s $16,744,218 player option and Alan Anderson‘s player option for $1,333,484.

Nuggets

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$63,742,655 (Eight Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$16,101,721 (Four Players) **
Projected Cap Flexibility=Over the projected cap by $13,344,376

*Includes Arron Afflalo‘s $7.5MM player option.
**Includes Timofey Mozgov‘s $4.95MM team option

Pacers

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$64,146,742 (Eight Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$0
Projected Cap Flexibility=$2,353,258

*Includes Roy Hibbert‘s $15,514,031 player option and David West‘s player option for $12.6MM.

Pelicans

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$52,414,854 (Five Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$1,792,335 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$12,292,811

*Includes Eric Gordon‘s player option for $15,514,031.

Pistons

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$40,750,527 (Eight Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$5,447,276 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$20,302,197

*Includes Cartier Martin‘s $1,270,964 player option and the $1,356,146 owed to Aaron Gray, who was waived.

Raptors

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$49,049,074 (Nine Players)
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$0
Projected Cap Flexibility=$17,450,926

Rockets

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$55,137,043 (Nine Players)
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$6,589,989 (Three Players) *
Projected Cap Flexibility=$4,772,968

*This includes the team’s $4,797,664 option for Kostas Papanikolaou.

Spurs

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$34,159,326 (Five Players)
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$0
Projected Cap Flexibility=$32,340,674

Suns

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$59,676,911 (12 Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$3MM
Projected Cap Flexibility=$3,823,089

*This amount includes the $777,778 owed to Michael Beasley, who was waived using the stretch provision, and Goran Dragic‘s $7.5MM player option.

Thunder

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$63,569,558 (10 Players)
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$0
Projected Cap Flexibility=$2,930,442

Timberwolves

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$69,003,699 (11 Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$0
Projected Cap Flexibility=Over the estimated cap by $2,503,699.

*This amount includes Thaddeus Young‘s $9,971,739 early termination option, Chase Budinger‘s $5MM player option, and Corey Brewer‘s $4,905,000 player option.

Trail Blazers

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$24,243,542 (Five Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$5,963,276 (Two Players)
Projected Cap Flexibility=$36,293,182

*This amount includes Steve Blake‘s $2,170,465 player option.

Warriors

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$78,772,757 (9 Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$3,815,000 (1 Player) **
Projected Cap Flexibility=Over the estimated cap by $16,087,757

*This amount includes Brandon Rush‘s $1,270,964 player option.
**This amount includes Marreese Speights‘s
$3,815,000 team option.

Wizards

Fully Guaranteed Contracts=$69,124,802 (10 Players) *
Non-Guaranteed Contracts=$0
Projected Cap Flexibility=Over the projected cap by $2,624,802

*Includes Paul Pierce‘s $5,543,725 player option and the $1,100,602 player option for Garrett Temple.

Note: The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Offseason In Review: Utah Jazz

Hoops Rumors is in the process of looking back at each team’s offseason, from the end of the playoffs in June right up until opening night. Trades, free agent signings, draft picks, contract extensions, option decisions, camp invitees, and more will be covered, as we examine the moves each franchise made over the last several months.

Signings

Extensions

Trades

Waiver Claims

  • Jordan Hamilton: Claimed from the Raptors. One year, $948K remaining. Contract was partially guaranteed for $25K. Waived after opening night.
  • Joe Ingles: Claimed from the Clippers. One year, $507K remaining. Non-guaranteed.

Draft Picks

  • Dante Exum (Round 1, 5th overall). Signed via rookie exception to rookie scale contract.
  • Rodney Hood (Round 1, 23rd overall). Signed via rookie exception to rookie scale contract.

Camp Invitees

Departing Players

Rookie Contract Option Decisions

Looking back on the Jazz’s offseason, it’s tough to see a franchise that has a definitive and confident rebuilding plan to return to contention. While I like a number of the moves that GM Dennis Lindsey made if analyzed individually, it’s how they fit into the larger picture that doesn’t make much sense. Utah will never be seen as a free agent hot spot in the eyes of NBA players, which does frame and influence much of what the team does in regard to roster moves and contracts. This limitation, courtesy of geography, makes the draft vital to the franchise’s long-term success, and it also makes retaining players that the organization has developed even more important.

NBA: Dallas Mavericks at Utah JazzThat helps explain the motivation behind Utah’s biggest and riskiest offseason move, which was matching the four-year, maximum salary offer sheet the Hornets inked with Gordon Hayward. Lindsey had made it clear that the Jazz were planning to match any offer the restricted free agent would receive on the open market all along, and the GM held true to that promise. Utah needs to fight to attract players, which made retaining the services of Hayward vital. But I question the wisdom of committing max-salary dollars to a player who is more of a complementary piece than a true franchise star. Even omitting his rookie-season numbers, Hayward’s career averages of 15.3 points, 4.3 rebounds, and 3.9 assists do not scream, “Give this man max money!”

On a team like Charlotte, which made the playoffs last season and was seemingly one shooter away from making some real noise in the Eastern Conference, the deal would have still been risky, but it may have been worth it in the short term. Restricted free agents often end up overpaid, since franchises know they will have to go above market value in order to discourage the player’s original team from matching the offer sheet. Just look to Jeremy Lin‘s and Omer Asik‘s deals with Houston, and Chandler Parsonswith Dallas, as examples of this. But Utah had other options since numerous teams had reportedly been offering sign-and-trade deals for Hayward in attempts to work around the possibility that Utah would match their offer sheets.

Hayward has improved every season he’s been in the league, which means the deal could still pay off for Utah. But the 24-year-old isn’t likely ever to be more than a very good player in the league, and it will take more than that to elevate the Jazz’s standing in the brutal Western Conference. I’ll also concede that since there aren’t many max-level free agents aching to live in Salt Lake City, Hayward’s deal isn’t the cap space killer that it would be on many other franchises. But it’s tough to argue that he is worth almost $63MM over four years.

Another questionable signing that Lindsey made is the four-year, $42MM (plus incentives) extension for Alec Burks. I like Burks as a player quite a bit. He’s a hard worker, can play and defend multiple positions, and at only 23 years of age, is likely to continue his upward development. But where exactly does he fit in long-term with the Jazz? Hayward is entrenched at small forward, and the backcourt has two young first-rounders whom the team needs to continue to develop in Trey Burke and Dante Exum. Burke and Exum have the potential to play side-by-side as starters for years to come, so it doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay an average annual salary of $10.5MM for a sixth man, no matter how talented Burks is. Of course, my concern will be negated if Exum, Utah’s first-rounder this year, fails to develop.

Exum was one if the biggest wildcards in this year’s draft lottery. He didn’t play college ball, and his international experience didn’t always come against top-flight competition, so it is hard to gauge what kind of a pro Exum will become. His physical talents are phenomenal. He is a blur on the court, and that coupled with his still growing 6’6″ frame makes him worth the risk on pure potential alone. Exum had been in the conversation as a darkhorse to become the No. 1 overall selection, and I still think the Sixers should have snapped him up with the third overall pick. But Utah snagged a potential superstar in Exum, if he can ever develop a reliable outside shot.

That last point is the key to the Jazz’s future. If Exum cannot develop his outside game, he’ll be limited to playing the point, a position which he apparently prefers. But the Jazz already have a talented young player manning that spot in 2013 lottery pick Trey Burke. Burke doesn’t project to be an All-Star, but he is still a very talented player who has a number of desirable intangibles that will help make his teammates better. It’s nice to have depth, as this year’s cavalcade of injuries around the league has demonstrated. But when you are a non-contending team trying to develop younger players, redundancies can hamper not only the franchise’s growth, but the growth of the players as well.

Lindsey’s excellent draft continued when he came away with one of the night’s biggest steals, selecting Rodney Hood with the 23rd overall pick. Hood was one of the most NBA-ready players in the draft, and his combination of length, athleticism, and outside shooting should make him a fixture in Utah’s rotation for years to come. He’s a player who should have gone much higher in the draft, and though he suffered a foot injury recently and will be out indefinitely, Hood will really help this team.

But here’s where another redundant and questionable move comes into play — the trade of Diante Garrett to the Raptors for Steve Novak. It’s tough to see the need for this deal, which puts the Jazz on the hook for a total of more than $7MM to Novak over this season and next. Novak is an amazing outside shooter, but he contributes little else. With Hayward a starter and Hood on the roster, Novak is an unnecessary piece who will siphon minutes away from younger players like Hood and Joe Ingles, and eat up too much cap space while doing so.

The Jazz claimed Ingles off waivers after the Clippers released him, and he was a shrewd pickup. If you don’t like Ingles, you don’t like what’s right about the game of basketball. He’s a hard worker, he’ll run through a wall if the coaches tell him to, and he’s a great guy to have in the locker room and on the bench. He’s someone I’d much rather see on the court than Novak.

The Jazz also needed to find a new head coach this offseason, after they elected not to renew Tyrone Corbin‘s contract. The man tasked with developing a new identity for the Jazz is former collegiate head coach and NBA assistant Quin Snyder. I’m extremely high on this move for Utah. Snyder is a great basketball mind and his effect on the Jazz’s offense should be fun to watch as the players become comfortable with the new system. His college coaching experience will also come in handy on a young team. The decision to hire Snyder was perhaps my favorite coaching move of the entire offseason.

Utah wasn’t able to come to terms on a contract extension with Enes Kanter, which leaves the 22-year-old from Switzerland poised to hit restricted free agency next summer. Kanter has shown improvement each season that he’s been in the league, and his agent, Max Ergul, is hoping that trend continues this season, which would serve to increase his client’s bargaining position. If Kanter’s salary demands become too great, or if another team swoops in with an offer sheet well out of line with what Kanter is worth, the Jazz should consider working out a sign-and-trade or simply letting Kanter walk. The franchise will have a number of rookie scale extensions to decide on in the next few years, and coupled with Hayward’s deal, any high-dollar payout would put a serious crimp on future moves. Utah does have Rudy Gobert waiting in the wings, and the team exercised his third-year rookie scale option in October. He’ll likely be a much less expensive long-term option than Kanter. Ideally, the team would retain both, but that might not be wise depending on how the market develops for Kanter.

The Jazz also made two under-the-radar free agent deals this past offseason. I like the signing of Toure’ Murry, who has the potential to develop into a useful rotation player. Murry is a high-energy defender who can add a spark off the bench. His partially guaranteed deal is also very team-friendly, and he isn’t the type of player who will gripe about his minutes. He’s drawn mention in trade rumors regarding Andrei Kirilenko, though it’s unclear whether the Jazz are truly thinking about bringing Kirilenko back to Utah. Kirilenko would add yet another redundant piece to the roster with the depth already present at both forward spots, and that would serve to reinforce questions about the team’s direction.

Signing Trevor Booker wasn’t a bad move either, as he is a high-energy rebounder who adds a needed level of toughness to the squad. The second year of his deal is non-guaranteed, so Lindsey limited the team’s risk and allowed some flexibility moving forward in case Kanter departs next summer. Booker can also be a valuable trade chip later in the season as well.

Utah has roughly $49.6MM in guaranteed salary on the books for 2015/16, and depending on the way Kanter’s situation plays out, this will allow the team to make some minor upgrades in the near future. But with deals for Hayward and Burks already on the books, coupled with the extensions the team seems likely to hand out to Gobert and Burke when they’re eligible, Utah’s long-term cap flexibility is set to disappear rather quickly. The Jazz need to reshape their roster and figure out which players to build around. For now, there are too many similar pieces monopolizing the franchise’s cap space. Until that is sorted out, the Jazz are far more likely to spend their springs in the draft lottery instead of the playoffs.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images. The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post. Chuck Myron contributed to this post.

Offseason In Review: Portland Trail Blazers

Hoops Rumors is in the process of looking back at each team’s offseason, from the end of the playoffs in June right up until opening night. Trades, free agent signings, draft picks, contract extensions, option decisions, camp invitees, and more will be covered, as we examine the moves each franchise made over the last several months.

Signings

Extensions

  • None

Trades

  • None

Waiver Claims

  • None

Draft Picks

  • None

Camp Invitees

Departing Players

Rookie Contract Option Decisions

The Blazers knew their starting lineup wasn’t the issue. Damian Lillard, Wesley Matthews, Nicolas Batum, LaMarcus Aldridge and Robin Lopez were the fifth-best five-man group in the league last season in terms of per-possession point differential among those that played at least 500 minutes together, according to NBA.com. That unit outscored opponents by 8.5 points per 100 possessions, but Portland as a whole was just plus-3.5 in that category. The Blazers entered the summer with no real cap flexibility and no draft picks, but GM Neil Olshey set about to prove just how valuable the mid-level and biannual exceptions can be.

NBA: Portland Trail Blazers at Denver NuggetsOlshey used the mid-level to ink Chris Kaman, a player who two years prior wouldn’t have been obtainable for that sort of money or for the reserve role the Blazers expect him to play. The one-time All-Star was one of the key figures in a fairly strong class of free agent centers in 2012, and he signed a one-year, $8MM deal with the Mavs that gave him the chance to excel in filling the team’s need for a starting center and to net more money over the long-term on his next contract. Instead, Kaman failed to see eye-to-eye with coach Rick Carlisle and played just 20.7 minutes per game that season, deflating his value and prompting him to turn to a one-year, $3.183MM deal for the taxpayer’s mid-level with the Lakers in 2013. Mike D’Antoni had even less use for him, and he appeared in only 39 games last season. Having turned 32 this past April, it seemed unlikely that Kaman would merit a raise, and quite conceivable that he’d have to settle for the minimum salary and a third-string job.

The Landmark Sports Agency client instead came away with $4.8MM this year, almost the full value of the $5.305MM non-taxpayer’s mid-level, plus a $1MM partial guarantee for 2015/16. It was a gamble for Olshey, but so far it’s paid off, as Kaman is putting up 10.9 points, 6.9 rebounds and 1.1 blocks in 19.0 minutes per game. He’s the NBA’s ninth leading per-minute rebounder among those who’ve played at least 100 total minutes this season, according to Basketball-Reference, and his 20.6 PER is a career high.

Olshey used all of the team’s biannual exception to come up with another player who began last season on the Lakers. It’s a reunion for the Blazers and Steve Blake, though Olshey wasn’t around when Blake played in Portland from 2007 to 2010. Olshey nonetheless had a chance to get an up-close look at the point guard when the GM was with the Clippers and Blake was in his early days with the other Staples Center tenants. Derek Fisher, Steve Nash and even Ramon Sessions had played in front of Blake on the Lakers, for whom he started just 45 games in three and a half years, but the 34-year-old hasn’t averaged fewer than 20.0 minutes per game since the 2004/05 season. That’s a testament to his value as a bench contributor, and so far for Portland he’s been an even more efficient ball-distributor than he had been in recent years. He’s averaging 7.1 assists against just 2.2 turnovers per 36 minutes, a ratio well clear of 3-to-1, and though most of his stats are by no means gaudy, he earns his keep in his time on the floor.

The Blazers as a whole are outscoring opponents at a rate of 8.6 points per 100 possessions so far this season, a rate almost identical to the one their starting five had produced last season, as NBA.com shows. Part of that is because the starting unit has upped its differential in that category to plus-10.7, but Portland’s bench has picked up some of the slack. The Blazers are missing one their top reserves from last season, as Mo Williams fled to the Timberwolves for a one-year, $3.75MM deal that was only slightly greater in value than the approximately $3.18MM that Portland was limited to giving him via Non-Bird rights. Agent Mark Bartelstein said before Williams signed with Minnesota that there was a chance, however slight, that his client would return to Portland even after the Blazers committed their mid-level to Hawes, which wiped out their ability to give Williams more than that $3.18MM. It’s unclear what Portland could have done at that point to woo him back, and perhaps a multiyear offer might have done the trick, but Williams nonetheless departed, leaving Portland to rely more heavily on C.J. McCollum, Allen Crabbe and Will Barton to supplement Blake. Still, that could be a blessing in disguise, since it’ll give the Blazers a chance to evaluate that trio, all of whom are either second- or third-year players, and much is eventually expected of McCollum, the 10th overall pick in 2013.

The Blazers made a tough call on another recent lottery pick, declining their fourth-year rookie scale option on 2012 No. 5 selection Thomas Robinson. The big man had a tough go of it in his first two seasons, rebounding efficiently and running the floor well but otherwise failing to show many glimpses of the promise that made him such a hot prospect coming out of Kansas. The Blazers can still re-sign him next summer, but he’ll be an unrestricted free agent, and they can’t pay him a salary greater than the $4,660,482 option they turned down. Robinson probably won’t merit more than that unless he has a breakout season this year, but teams rarely re-sign players after declining their rookie scale options, so he’s likely in his final days with Portland.

The decision pick up Meyers Leonard‘s somewhat cheaper rookie scale option wasn’t clear-cut, since Leonard has been just as disappointing after having been the No. 11 pick in the same draft that Robinson was a part of. Still, Leonard’s willingness to try to remake himself into a 7’1″ stretch power forward bears watching, and perhaps Portland felt compelled to keep him around for at least another season to see how that experiment turns out.

Such tinkering pales in comparison to the importance of Aldridge’s free agency in the summer to come, though the team’s preeminent star made it clear this past summer that he intends to re-sign with the Blazers. That he was willing at times last season to entertain the idea of signing an extension, which wouldn’t be in his best financial interests, is demonstrative of his commitment to Portland, even though he said in July that an extension was no longer a consideration. It was also quite a switch from the summer of 2013, when it seemed that Aldridge was looking for a way out of town in the wake of consecutive losing seasons. Last year’s revival was clearly a game-changer for the long-term future of the Blazers, and the team’s second consecutive hot start is impressing upon the league, and upon Aldridge, that last season was no fluke.

Olshey hasn’t made any earth-shattering moves in his three offseasons with the Blazers, aside from the shrewd drafting of Lillard at No. 6 in 2012, but adding Lopez in the summer of 2013 and Kaman and Blake this year show his ability to be a consistent singles hitter. Still, he’ll most likely need to display a little more power for the team to become a true title contender, and this coming offseason, when only three Blazers have fully guaranteed contracts, will provide that opportunity.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images. The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.