The NBA has seen a rise in gambling-related concerns since sports betting became widely legalized in 2018. The most famous case was when Jontay Porter received a lifetime ban from the NBA and pleaded guilty to a federal felony charge of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, but recent investigations into Malik Beasley as well as Terry Rozier have once again brought the issue to the forefront of public consciousness.
It’s a matter that both the NBA and the National Basketball Players Association are aware of and are searching for answers to, according to ESPN’s David Purdum, who writes that both the league and the players’ union have come out in support of limitations on specific types of bets that are most likely to be vulnerable to manipulation by players and gamblers.
In the wake of the Porter case, the NBA asked its betting partners not to allow prop bets for players on two-way contracts. There is now an expectation that more restrictions will follow, especially given widespread sentiment among players that the league’s gambling partnerships are problematic.
There are other reasons for the desired changes. Purdum writes that the players’ union is less concerned with Porter’s case representing a nascent trend and more concerned about the abuse bettors direct towards players regarding failed prop bets.
“[Players] are concerned that prop bets have become an increasingly alarming source of player harassment, both online and in person,” an NBPA spokesperson said. “If tighter regulations can help minimize that abuse, then we support taking a closer look at them.”
One area of specific focus is microbets, which are centered around specific in-game outcomes. New Jersey and Ohio have both introduced bills to ban microbets, and Major League Baseball is currently engaged in discussions about them after two Cleveland Guardians pitchers were placed on leave over suspicious microbet activity.