Hoops Rumors Originals

Extension Candidate: Jonas Valanciunas

NBA: Toronto Raptors at Orlando Magic

Courtesy of USA Today Sports Images

No one who’s a part of the Raptors core was as highly drafted as Jonas Valanciunas, the No. 5 pick from 2011. Toronto had to wait a year for the Lithuanian center while he continued to play overseas, but he’s quickly established himself as an NBA starter in the three seasons since. It’s convincing the Raptors that he can finish games that has proven troublesome for the 7-footer, who often sat on the bench in crunch time this past season, one in which he played a relatively meager 26.2 minutes per game despite starting in all 80 of his regular season appearances. The Raptors reportedly want an extension with him, and while that’s no surprise, GM Masai Ujiri surely has a ceiling for negotiations with a center who saw the floor for barely more than half the game.

Still, Ujiri called Valanciunas “a huge part of our team” at season’s end, adding that the way the team deployed the center this past season would be a “big discussion” he would have with coach Dwane Casey and his staff. Valanciunas appeared to stagnate this past season after a leap between his rookie and sophomore years, and that was a factor in the changes that ultimately took place to Casey’s staff, as Ken Berger of CBSSports.com reported a few months ago. All of that would suggest that Ujiri feels Valanciunas is capable of playing more minutes and finishing more games than he did in 2014/15, which bodes well for the Leon Rose client as extension talks loom.

The problem lies on defense. The Raptors were a better defensive team when Valanciunas sat than when he played last season, by a measure of 1.6 points per 100 possessions, as NBA.com shows. He was a minus defender, according to Basketball-Reference’s Box Plus Minus. Those are serious issues for any NBA starting center, let alone one whom a team is considering for a long-term commitment. ESPN’s Real Plus Minus is kinder, ranking him as the 33rd-best defensive center, two spots behind fellow rookie scale extension candidate John Henson, whom other defensive metrics love, as I examined earlier. A ranking of No. 33 among centers is cold comfort, nonetheless. Casey’s forte is defense, but he’ll have to work some true wizardry to give the Raptors a championship-level defense any time soon unless Valanciunas can improve on that end.

Ujiri made moves to improve the team’s defense this past season, none more striking than his four-year, $58MM deal for three-and-D forward DeMarre Carroll. He also brought in Bismack Biyombo, a defensive specialist, to play as the backup to Valanciunas. Biyombo, who averaged only 4.8 points per game last season, would be the only logical alternative for Casey if he doesn’t want Valanciunas on the floor down the stretch, so unless the Raptors merely want to protect a lead, it seems likely that Valanciunas will be on the floor when the final horn sounds.

The 23-year-old has shown he’s capable of getting better in other regards. His PER vaulted from 16.1 in 2013/14 to a strong 20.6 this past season, a sign that he made the most of his time on the floor. Indeed, Valanciunas scored more points per game in fewer minutes and on slightly fewer shots. He made a career-best 57.2% of his attempts from the floor, upping the percentage of his shots that came at point-blank range, as Basketball-Reference shows. He’s also become a better rebounder, having averaged nearly 12 rebounds per 36 minutes this past season after he started out at just 9.0 in the per-36 category as a rookie.

Next year’s free agent class is relatively thin after the top few names, but the available centers are fairly intriguing. Andre Drummond seems destined to either receive an extension from the Pistons or re-sign next summer, but Dwight Howard and Pau Gasol can opt out. Former Florida teammates Al Horford and Joakim Noah figure to be highly sought-after, as does Al Jefferson. Hassan Whiteside will have no shortage of suitors if he duplicates his breakthrough year for the Heat, and Roy Hibbert can vault himself into the upper tier with a bounceback season for the Lakers. Teams will have serious money to throw around, with the salary cap set to surge to $89MM, but Valanciunas will have competition for it.

The Raptors can go in several different directions. They only have about $42MM in salary commitments for 2016/17 as it stands, though that figure will almost certainly rise to approximately $45.5MM when Toronto picks up its team options on Lucas Nogueira and Bruno Caboclo. Early word indicates that DeMar DeRozan will opt out, and Terrence Ross, like Valanciunas, can hit restricted free agency if he doesn’t receive an extension. Re-signing DeRozan, Ross and Valanciunas at market value would likely leave the team without the capacity to chase top-tier free agents next summer, when Toronto native Tristan Thompson would be an unrestricted free agent if he signs his qualifying offer.

I speculated in our Raptors offseason outlook that Valanciunas and Rose would ask for $12MM salaries that would put him in line with what Nikola Vucevic, another defensively challenged starting center, received on his extension from the Magic last year. The spending in this summer’s free agent market, including a max deal of more than $17.5MM a year for defensive sieve Enes Kanter and Ujiri’s commitment of a $14.5MM average annual value to Carroll, suggests that $12MM is too low a starting point. The Valanciunas camp will probably ask for at least as much as Carroll received, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the center ultimately end up with $13-14MM a year, numbers that look high but are well beneath the projected $20.4MM max for players with his level of experience.

That may end up a bargain if Casey and new assistants Rex Kalamian, Andy Greer and Jerry Stackhouse turn Valanciunas into a credible defender and continue his offensive development. Ujiri appears to have no shortage of faith that Valanciunas will improve and seems to view him as a cornerstone for the future. That’s probably enough motivation for Toronto to make an offer lucrative enough to get a deal done this fall.

How much do you think Valanciunas should make per year on his next deal? Leave a comment to tell us.

Hoops Rumors Community Shootaround 8/12/15

Suns forward Markieff Morris has reportedly demanded a trade that would remove him from Phoenix prior to the start of the 2015/16 campaign. Markieff and his twin brother, Marcus, had both inked extensions with the Suns last September with the intention of remaining together throughout their respective playing careers. Unfortunately for the twins, Marcus was dealt early in July to the Pistons in an effort for Phoenix to clear the necessary cap space to make a run at unrestricted free agent LaMarcus Aldridge, who ended up signing with the Spurs.

Markieff has painted himself into a bit of a corner, as well as likely reduced any potential return that Phoenix would receive for him, with his pointed statements toward the Suns organization. “One thing for sure, I am not going to be there,” Morris said on Tuesday of Phoenix. “If you want to put that out there, you can put that out,” he added. “. . . I am not to going to be there at all.” According to the report by Keith Pompey of The Philadelphia Inquirer, Morris isn’t upset that the team traded his brother, but instead believes he was misled by the team, as well as feels slighted by how he and Marcus were informed of the deal with Detroit.

So here’s the topic of the day: How will the Markieff Morris/Suns situation be resolved?

Will Phoenix be able to find a taker for Morris, or is a buyout arrangement in the cards? If Morris is in fact traded, what team do you see as being a good fit for him and his salary? What kind of return will the Suns be able to get for the 25-year-old? Or do you see the two sides working out their differences, even if it is for the short term? Take to the comments section below to share your thoughts and opinions. We look forward to what you have to say.

Note: Since these Shootarounds are meant to be guided by you the reader, we certainly welcome your input on the topics we present. If there is something you’d like to see pop up here for a discussion, shoot me a message at hoopsrumorsmailbag@gmail.com or hit me up on Twitter at @EddieScarito to submit topics or ideas for what we should present in future posts.

2015/16 NBA Team Schedules Released

The league has released the official team schedules for the 2015/16 NBA season this evening. One of the primary goals the league had in creating this year’s schedule was to reduce the number of back-to-back games and four games in five days that NBA teams play, writes Jeff Zillgitt of USA Today. In an effort to reduce wear and tear on the players the NBA was able to cut the average amount of back-to-backs per team from 19.3 last season to 17.8 for 2015/16. Other changes include reducing the amount of four games in five days teams will play from 2.3 in 2014/15 to .9 this coming season, as well as reducing the distance each team will be required to travel by 2%, according to Zillgitt.

I think this is the best schedule that we’ve ever produced,” NBA senior vice president of basketball operations Kiki VanDeWeghe told Zillgitt. “We are extremely mindful of player rest, recuperation and we were able to reduce four games in five nights and back-to-backs to all-time lows. We want to be mindful of putting the best product on the floor that we possibly can. The rigors of an NBA season are tough. Nobody denies that.

Listed below are links to the full 2015/16 season schedules for each NBA team organized by Conference and Division:

EASTERN CONFERENCE

Atlantic Division

Central Division

Southeast Division


WESTERN CONFERENCE

Northwest Division

Pacific Division

Southwest Division

Poll: 2013 NBA Draft Take Two (Pick No. 8)

Drafting players is far from an exact science, and many a GM has been second-guessed for his draft night decisions. I’m willing to bet that every team executive has at least one pick that he would like a mulligan for. While life, and the NBA, doesn’t allow for such opportunities, we at Hoops Rumors decided it would be fun to give our readers a second take at picking players, complete with the benefit of hindsight.

The first NBA Draft lottery picks we’re tackling is 2013’s, the year that the Cavaliers surprised quite a few people when they nabbed UNLV forward Anthony Bennett with the No. 1 overall pick. Quite a number of talented players were in that year’s player pool, including Victor OladipoNerlens NoelGiannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert, just to rattle off a few.

In the days ahead, we’ll be posting a series of reader polls that will ask you to vote on the player whom you believe should have been selected with each pick in the 2013 Draft lottery. We’ll continue onward with the Pistons, who held the No. 8 overall pick that season. Readers, you are now on the clock! Cast your vote for Detroit’s pick and check back tomorrow night for the results, as well as for your chance to vote for whom the Jazz should have taken with the pick they traded for at No. 9. But don’t limit yourself to a simple button click. Take to the comments section below and share your thoughts on the pick and why you voted the way that you did. Also, if I fail to list a player who you think should be selected, feel free to post that in the comments section and I’ll be certain to tally those votes as well.

Draft Results thus far:

  1. Cavaliers: Giannis Antetokounmpo
  2. Magic: Victor Oladipo
  3. Wizards: Nerlens Noel
  4. Hornets: Rudy Gobert
  5. Suns: Michael Carter-Williams
  6. 76ers: Ben McLemore
  7. Kings: Mason Plumlee
With the No. 8 Overall Pick the Pistons Select...
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope 18.94% (193 votes)
Dennis Schröder 16.00% (163 votes)
Sergey Karasev 12.66% (129 votes)
Otto Porter 7.95% (81 votes)
Tim Hardaway Jr. 6.48% (66 votes)
Trey Burke 5.89% (60 votes)
Gorgui Dieng 5.59% (57 votes)
Alex Len 4.42% (45 votes)
Steven Adams 4.12% (42 votes)
Shabazz Muhammad 4.02% (41 votes)
Kelly Olynyk 2.94% (30 votes)
C.J. McCollum 2.36% (24 votes)
Cody Zeller 1.77% (18 votes)
Robert Covington 1.67% (17 votes)
Anthony Bennett 1.18% (12 votes)
Matthew Dellevadova 1.08% (11 votes)
Tony Snell 0.88% (9 votes)
Reggie Bullock 0.39% (4 votes)
Mike Muscala 0.29% (3 votes)
Allen Crabbe 0.20% (2 votes)
Isaiah Canaan 0.20% (2 votes)
Ray McCallum 0.20% (2 votes)
Lucas Nogueira 0.20% (2 votes)
Shane Larkin 0.20% (2 votes)
Solomon Hill 0.10% (1 votes)
Archie Goodwin 0.10% (1 votes)
Nemanja Nedovic 0.10% (1 votes)
Ryan Kelly 0.10% (1 votes)
Andre Roberson 0.00% (0 votes)
Total Votes: 1,019

If you’re a Trade Rumors app user, click here.

Hoops Rumors Chat Transcript

4:03pm: We hosted the weekly live chat.

3:00pm: Markieff Morris made it clear Tuesday that he doesn’t want to play for the Suns anymore, so it looks like Phoenix has a move to make before the start of training camp at the end of next month. The onus is on GM Ryan McDonough, now the clear-cut leader of the front office, to either engineer a reconciliation, which seems like a long shot, or pull off a trade that minimizes the damage. It’s already been an active summer in Phoenix, where the Suns are anxious to return to the playoffs, as Paul Coro of The Arizona Republic examined in depth as part of an interview with Hoops Rumors earlier this week, and it seems like it’ll stay busy.

We can chat about Morris, the Suns, and the other 29 teams in today’s chat, so click here to join!

Players Cash In After Turning Down Options

The 15 free agents who turned down player or early terminations this year knew what they were doing, by and large. A dozen of them wound up with deals that give them better average annual value than they would have made on their respective option years. No one made out better than Goran Dragic, who decided against a $7.5MM option and wound up with a five-year deal worth more than $85MM instead, a leap of greater than $9.5MM per year.

Still, two players took a financial hit when they opted out. David West‘s was largely voluntary, as he signed a two-year deal for the minimum salary, well beneath his market value, not long after turning down $12.6MM for next year from the Pacers. Paul Pierce turned a player option on his full mid-level deal with the Wizards into a cheaper taxpayer’s mid-level contract with the Clippers.

One case still remains open, but chances seem better that Smith joins West and Pierce among those taking pay cuts than the 12 who cashed in. Smith could have had nearly $6.4MM from the Cavs for next season, but he elected free agency instead, and Cleveland, the only title contender with the capacity to sign him outright for the value of his option or greater, is reportedly letting a dwindling market dictate his price.

Below are the 12 players who signed contracts that are more lucrative on a yearly basis than the options they turned down, ranked by increase in average annual value:

  1. Goran Dragic — turned down $7.5MM, signed for five years, $85,002,250 ($17,000,450 average annual value).
  2. Al-Farouq Aminu — turned down $1,100,602, signed for four years, $30MM ($7.5MM average annual value).
  3. Kevin Love — turned down $16,744,218, signed for five years, $113,211,750 ($22,642,350 average annual value).
  4. Ed Davis — turned down $1,100,602, signed for three years, $20MM ($6,666,667 average annual value).
  5. Brook Lopez — turned down $16,744,218, signed for three years, $63,497,025 ($21,165,675 average annual value).
  6. Dwyane Wade — turned down $16.125MM, signed for one year, $20MM.
  7. Alan Anderson — turned down $1,333,484, signed for one year, $4MM.
  8. Thaddeus Young — turned down $10,221,739, signed for four years, $50MM ($12.5MM average annual value).
  9. Monta Ellis — turned down $8.72MM, signed for four years, $43.981MM ($10,995,250 average annual value).
  10. LeBron James — turned down $21,573,398, signed for two years, $46,974,673 ($23,487,337 average annual value).
  11. Jameer Nelson — turned down $2,854,940, signed for three years, $13,621,575 ($4,540,525 average annual value).
  12. Arron Afflalo — turned down $7.75MM, signed for two years, $16MM ($8MM average annual value).

Here are three players who opted out and either wound up taking pay cuts or remain in free agency:

  • David West — turned down $12.6MM, signed for two years, $3,050,846 ($1,525,423 average annual value).
  • Paul Pierce — turned down $5,543,725, signed for three years, $10,583,760 ($3,527,920 average annual value).
  • J.R. Smith — turned down $6,399,750.

The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Aside from West’s minimum-salary deal, which signing listed here surprised you the most? Leave a comment to tell us.

Poll: 2013 NBA Draft Take Two (Pick No. 7)

Drafting players is far from an exact science, and many a GM has been second-guessed for his draft night decisions. I’m willing to bet that every team executive has at least one pick that he would like a mulligan for. While life, and the NBA, doesn’t allow for such opportunities, we at Hoops Rumors decided it would be fun to give our readers a second take at picking players, complete with the benefit of hindsight.

The first NBA Draft lottery picks we’re tackling is 2013’s, the year that the Cavaliers surprised quite a few people when they nabbed UNLV forward Anthony Bennett with the No. 1 overall pick. Quite a number of talented players were in that year’s player pool, including Victor OladipoNerlens NoelGiannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert, just to rattle off a few.

In the weeks ahead, we’ll be posting a series of reader polls that will ask you to vote on the player whom you believe should have been selected with each pick in the lottery. We’ll continue onward with the Kings, who held the No. 7 overall pick that season. Readers, you are now on the clock! Cast your vote for Sacramento’s pick and check back tomorrow night for the results, as well as for your chance to vote for whom the Pistons should have taken at No. 8. But don’t limit yourself to a simple button click. Take to the comments section below and share your thoughts on the pick and why you voted the way that you did. Also, if I fail to list a player who you think should be selected, feel free to post that in the comments section and I’ll be certain to tally those votes as well.

Draft Results thus far:

  1. Cavaliers: Giannis Antetokounmpo
  2. Magic: Victor Oladipo
  3. Wizards: Nerlens Noel
  4. Hornets: Rudy Gobert
  5. Suns: Michael Carter-Williams
  6. 76ers: Ben McLemore
With the No. 7 Overall Pick the Kings Select...
Mason Plumlee 16.37% (187 votes)
Dennis Schröder 15.67% (179 votes)
Mike Muscala 9.89% (113 votes)
Trey Burke 6.48% (74 votes)
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope 6.39% (73 votes)
Gorgui Dieng 6.30% (72 votes)
Steven Adams 5.95% (68 votes)
Alex Len 5.60% (64 votes)
Otto Porter 4.99% (57 votes)
Shabazz Muhammad 4.03% (46 votes)
Tim Hardaway Jr. 3.85% (44 votes)
Kelly Olynyk 3.15% (36 votes)
Anthony Bennett 2.36% (27 votes)
Cody Zeller 1.49% (17 votes)
C.J. McCollum 1.49% (17 votes)
Tony Snell 1.49% (17 votes)
Matthew Dellavedova 1.31% (15 votes)
Robert Covington 1.23% (14 votes)
Lucas Nogueira 0.61% (7 votes)
Solomon Hill 0.26% (3 votes)
Reggie Bullock 0.26% (3 votes)
Archie Goodwin 0.26% (3 votes)
Sergey Karasev 0.18% (2 votes)
Ryan Kelly 0.18% (2 votes)
Shane Larkin 0.09% (1 votes)
Nemanja Nedovic 0.09% (1 votes)
Andre Roberson 0.00% (0 votes)
Total Votes: 1,142

If you’re a Trade Rumors app user, click here.

The Beat: Paul Coro On The Suns

Paul Coro of The Arizona Republic

Paul Coro of The Arizona Republic

Nobody knows NBA teams better than beat writers, save for those who draw paychecks with an NBA owner’s signature on them. The reporters who are with the teams they cover every day gain an intimate knowledge of the players, coaches and executives they write about and develop sources who help them break news and stay on top of rumors.

We at Hoops Rumors will be chatting with beat writers from around the league and sharing their responses to give you a better perspective on how and why teams make some of their most significant moves. Last week, we spoke with Jody Genessy of The Deseret News about the Jazz. Click here to see all of the previous editions of this series.

Today, we gain insight on the Suns from Paul Coro the Arizona Republic. You can follow Paul on Twitter at @paulcoro, and click here to check out his stories on azcentral.com.

Hoops Rumors: How do you sense that people within the Suns organization feel about their pursuit of LaMarcus Aldridge? Do they take the fact that they came as close as they did to landing him as an encouraging development that they can build on for next summer, or are they just disappointed that they didn’t get him?

Paul Coro: There is some of both. They sense that they were so close, perhaps even ahead at one point, in landing Aldridge that there was disappointment in not signing him. The team has been seeking an All-Star player for years and had an intricate plan to land one that they thought would fit their system and needs. Despite the disappointment, they are encouraged that a player of his caliber put the Suns ahead of all other suitors, except for San Antonio. As they struggle to land the team’s first major free agent signing since Steve Nash in 2004, being in the final two for Aldridge showed them that the franchise, market and team can still be a viable threat in free agency but each player and case is unique.

Hoops Rumors: The Tyson Chandler signing seemed to take everybody off guard, especially given the presence of Alex Len. Do you think the Suns still would have gone after Chandler if they didn’t think he would help them land Aldridge?

Paul Coro: The Suns say they wanted Chandler regardless of how the Aldridge pursuit turned out and they obviously had to be prepared for that outcome, given that the Spurs were such huge favorites to get Aldridge entering July. He definitely was a major piece in the plan to land Aldridge, who they knew had a great deal of respect for Chandler and wanted to play exclusively at power forward. It changed the race to have Chandler surprisingly walk in that room for the first Aldridge meeting. But on his own, Chandler addresses many of the Suns issues from last season. He addresses a major issue with lack of leadership. He is the pick-and-roll threat they have lacked with two starting guards who can run pick-and-roll and a system that needs a big man to help suck a defense into the paint to create space for perimeter shooters. He also helps the Suns’ shortcomings with interior defense and rebounding while providing a mentor to develop Alex Len, who is only 22 years old with 111 appearances.

Hoops Rumors: It doesn’t seem like there will be wholesale changes now that president of basketball operations Lon Babby has transitioned to advisory role, placing GM Ryan McDonough firmly in charge of player personnel. Still, is there a more subtle difference between the way Babby and McDonough operate that you think will have a tangible effect going forward?

Paul Coro: The basketball operation and its roles will stay much the same but it will be clearer for teams dealing with the Suns to know who is the point of contact for all things basketball. McDonough already has had his fingerprints on all aspects of the Suns’ operation and this only enhances his ability to lead the department.

Hoops Rumors: If the Morris brothers hadn’t run into legal trouble, do you think Marcus Morris would still be a Sun today?

Paul Coro: The legal issue certainly did not help Marcus Morris’ case but the Suns made the trade, in large part, to show Aldridge that they had the salary cap space to sign him without asking him to commit before they had made the moves to do so. It also addressed an issue at small forward, where the Suns were overloaded and have second-year player T.J. Warren earning a chance for more time. With Warren and P.J. Tucker, there would be little time for another player and that would have left Marcus Morris, a part-time starter, potentially on the outside of the rotation and disgruntled. Danny Granger, another small forward who had been rehabilitating in Phoenix, and Reggie Bullock, a swingman who can play some small forward, were also sent to Detroit in that trade.

Hoops Rumors: This past season was a disappointment. Which move from the 2014 offseason do you think the Suns regret the most?

Paul Coro: The signing of Isaiah Thomas was a good deal for the contract value and his production but it disrupted team chemistry by bringing in another point guard who was accustomed to starting and being a team’s primary playmaker. Goran Dragic already had seen the Suns trade for another point guard, Eric Bledsoe, and draft another point guard, Tyler Ennis, since he re-signed with the Suns. Then, Thomas entered the picture and outwardly aimed for a starting job and the status to close games. The Suns did not plan to use three point guards at once but it became a necessity to take advantage of their talent and keep each of the three point guards content, although it still left Dragic unhappy. He was the point guard who played most off the ball after being an All-NBA performer as a point guard in 2013/14, when Bledsoe missed half the season.

Hoops Rumors: It seems odd that Robert Sarver appears as willing to be aggressive as he is now in getting the Suns back to the playoffs after having been notorious for cost-cutting moves when the team was a title contender. Do you think Sarver has truly changed his approach?

Paul Coro: The franchise has matched an all-time low for playoff absence, a five-year dry spell that matches the stretch from the franchise’s second through sixth seasons. The Suns remain aggressive because they want to get back in the playoffs and do not feel like they are that far away, especially given the season they had in 2013/14. Their research also makes them not believe in the idea of tanking because of how long it takes to rebuild and the lack of a guarantee for it to work, not to mention the economic impact on the franchise in the meantime. This is a franchise that will soon be seeking public support for a new arena so a franchise-record playoff drought would not help generate that backing.

Largest Trade Exceptions

The volume of teams going under the cap this season has drained the leaguewide supply of trade exceptions, which are only available to over-the-cap teams. We’ll likely see more trade exceptions build up throughout the season, since many teams have gone back over the cap thanks to their summer signings, but for now, only five trade exceptions are of at least $5MM in value.

This post shows each of them in detail, with an analysis of just how likely it is that the teams that have them will actually use them.

Cavaliers
Amount: $10,522,500
Obtained: Brendan Haywood (Trail Blazers)
Expires: 7/27/16
Likelihood of use: Excellent. Cleveland doesn’t want to pay taxes if it doesn’t have to, which is seemingly why it rolled over the Haywood contract into this trade exception in the first place; it looked as though the Cavs didn’t see an available player that could help them in the month leading up to Haywood’s guarantee date. Thus, they bought themselves an extra year. It seems likely that someone the Cavs like will become available from a team looking to clear salary between now and the end of next July, and Cleveland will be ready to pounce.

Timberwolves
Amount: $6,308,194
Obtained: Kevin Love (Cavaliers)
Expires: 8/23/15
Likelihood of use: Poor. The Wolves are running out of time with this one, with less than two weeks remaining until the anniversary of the Love trade. Minnesota has a young roster with veterans Kevin Garnett and Andre Miller already there to provide mentorship. The team probably isn’t going to make the playoffs this coming season, but that doesn’t figure to be a priority just yet for a still-developing bunch. The Timberwolves seem well set up to achieve their modest goals this season, so unless they feel like taking on someone like Mario Chalmers from the Heat just to collect assets, this exception seems destined to go unused.

Warriors
Amount: $5,387,825
Obtained: David Lee (Celtics)
Expires: 7/27/16
Likelihood of use: Fair. Just as with the Cavs, the Warriors are willing to pay taxes, but not just for anyone. Part of the reason they traded Lee in the first place was to clear some of their tax liabilities, so it would be surprising to see Golden State undo the progress it’s made in that regard. Still, the Warriors aren’t yet in line to pay the tax for 2016/17, so it’s reasonable to envision the team using the exception sometime next summer.

Bucks
Amount: $5,200,000
Obtained: Zaza Pachulia (Mavericks)
Expires: 7/9/16
Likelihood of use: Good. The Bucks are intent on a deliberate approach to team building, but a weapon like this is eminently valuable for a team with no shortage of financial flexibility for the future. The team is poised to enter this coming season with only about $49MM on the books for 2016/17, so the Bucks have plenty of leeway to add a player at the deadline who can boost their playoff chances, even if it’s somebody’s who’s on a long-term contract.

Timberwolves
Amount: $5,000,000
Obtained: Chase Budinger (Pacers)
Expires: 7/12/16
Likelihood of use: Good. Unlike the Love exception, it seems like Minnesota will find some way to use this one, if only because they have so much time in which to find a purpose for it. The Wolves can use it on a veteran to help a playoff push for 2016/17, making a deal reminiscent of the one the Wizards pulled off this summer for Jared Dudley.

The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Do you have trade ideas for any of these exceptions? Share them here by leaving a comment.

Extension Candidate: John Henson

Courtesy of USA Today Sports Images

Courtesy of USA Today Sports Images

The Bucks trudged through the muck of a 15-win season in 2013/14, and they watched the career of Larry Sanders, the breakout star of the 2013 playoff team, come apart at the seams. So, they deserve tons of credit for their fast ascent over the past 12 months, snagging the sixth seed in the Eastern Conference this past season and landing Greg Monroe, No. 7 on the June Hoops Rumors Free Agent Power Rankings. John Henson, Milwaukee’s lottery pick from 2012, has been there for all of it, and it seems like both sides want to continue their partnership for years to come, as they’re reportedly on track for a rookie scale extension before the October 31st deadline.

Still, Henson hasn’t exactly seemed the most likely candidate to become a franchise cornerstone. He’s never started more than 23 games in a season, and last year, he averaged just 18.3 minutes per game. Monroe’s presence makes it difficult to envision his role expanding, unless Milwaukee wants to play two traditional big men, the sort of arrangement that appeared to hasten Monroe’s departure from the Pistons. Besides, Jabari Parker looks like the team’s future at power forward, particularly with Giannis Antetokounmpo and Khris Middleton commanding spots on the wing. Henson may well start early in the season if Parker isn’t healthy, but the No. 2 overall pick will almost certainly reclaim his job before long.

Henson seems destined to become, at best, a sixth man if the Bucks keep their existing core together. Still, Milwaukee apparently sees him as a key part of that group, even though he seemed to be available, if only for a truly attractive return, at the trade deadline. Grantland’s Zach Lowe speculated last month that Henson would end up with salaries of $10MM or more, money that’s not altogether unwarranted for a 24-year-old center with a lottery pedigree who’s indeed been productive in his limited time on the floor. The perplexing part is that it’s the Bucks who appear ready to pay him.

The former 14th overall pick’s field goal percentage has risen each of the past two years from a subpar 48.6% as a rookie. He shot 56.6% this past season, a year in which he attempted a far greater percentage of his shots from 3 feet and in, according to Basketball-Reference data. Henson’s PER has held steady, and his 18.0 figure from 2014/15 matches his career mark. He’s a strong defender who did just fine inheriting the role of rim protector from Sanders, as he averaged an impressive 2.0 blocks per game in spite of his short minutes last season. Indeed, Basketball-Reference’s Defensive Box Plus Minus shows he made quite a leap this past season, though ESPN’s Defensive Real Plus Minus wasn’t quite as kind, ranking him as only the 31st-best center in that category. Still, the Bucks were a better defensive team with Henson on the floor by a measure of 2.5 points per 100 possessions, as NBA.com shows. Yet perhaps most noteworthy among the NBA.com data is that the Bucks were stronger overall when Henson wasn’t playing because of the disparity on offense. Milwaukee scored 102.4 points per 100 possessions when Henson sat and just 96.2 when he hit the court.

That’s a noisy stat, since it doesn’t account for the other personnel on the floor. Still, it highlights the notion that it would be a risky proposition to commit eight-figure salaries to a player who’s averaged only 8.1 points per game for his career.

The Bucks nonetheless have money to burn. They have only about $36MM committed for 2016/17, though that doesn’t include nearly $13.3MM in rookie scale team options for Parker and others that Milwaukee seems likely to exercise. Still, $49.3MM against a projected $89MM salary cap leaves plenty of flexibility, and the Bucks have to spend at least 90% of the salary cap anyway. Committing part of that money to an efficient, shot-blocking center who’s on the upswing probably wouldn’t constitute the worst move a team has ever made.

Most years, the smart play for the Bucks would entail waiting another year to see how they would find time and space for Henson amid the presence of Monroe, and whether Henson would take another step forward in his development. Next summer’s rising cap and relatively thin crop of 2016 free agents, after a few stars on the top, seems to be driving Milwaukee to the bargaining table now. The extension window provides for exclusive negotiating, so another team with even more cap space to play with, one that could offer Henson a starting job, can’t jump in with an eye-popping number and force the Bucks to match a player-friendly offer sheet, as might be the case in restricted free agency next summer.

The Jim Tanner client may jump at such an opportunity to cash in a year from now, but if the Bucks indeed come with an extension offer of $10MM or more per year, it would be exceedingly difficult for a player who didn’t see 20 minutes per game last season to pass that up. It’s somewhat reminiscent of the Alec Burks extension from last fall, though Burks had played 28.1 minutes per game the season before the Jazz bestowed a deal worth $42MM plus incentives over four years. Burks missed most of this past season with a shoulder injury, and it’s not a given that the Jazz would be so munificent if he were a restricted free agent this summer. An injury, and a team that performs well in his absence, just as the Jazz did without Burks down the stretch this year, might lead the Bucks to conclude that Henson is expendable.

So, I think the sides will indeed come to an extension, and while Lowe’s $10MM-plus prediction seems surprising on the surface, the circumstances suggest that it’s a reasonable expectation. At worst, a fairly priced Henson could become a valuable trade chip for the Bucks down the road.

Do you think the Bucks and Henson will do an extension, and if so, how much do you think he’ll get? Leave a comment to tell us.